Comparison of Supervised versus Self-Administered Stretching on Bench Press Maximal Strength and Force Development.

PURPOSE

While there is reported superior effectiveness with supervised training, it usually requires specialized exercise facilities and instructors. It is reported in the literature that high-volume stretching improves pectoralis muscles strength under supervised conditions while practical relevance is discussed. Therefore, the study objective was to compare the effects of volume equated, supervised- and self-administered home-based stretching on strength performance.

METHODS

Sixty-three recreational participants were equally assigned to either a supervised static stretching, home-based stretching, or control group. The effects of 15 min pectoralis stretching, 4 days per week for 8 weeks, were assessed on dynamic and isometric bench press strength and force development.

RESULTS

While there was a large magnitude maximal strength increase ( < 0.001-0.023, ƞ = 0.118-0.351), force development remained unaffected. Dynamic maximal strength in both groups demonstrated large magnitude increases compared to the control group ( < 0.001-0.001, d = 1.227-0.905). No differences between the intervention group for maximal strength ( = 0.518-0.821, d = 0.101-0.322) could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results could potentially be attributed to stretch-induced tension (mechanical overload) with subsequent anabolic adaptations, and alternative explanatory approaches are discussed. Nevertheless, home-based stretching seems a practical alternative to supervised training with potential meaningful applications in different settings.