Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;22(10):2125-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.036. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy often is recommended after an episode of diverticulitis to exclude missed colorectal cancer (CRC). This is a controversial recommendation based on limited evidence. We estimated the prevalence and odds of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia on colonoscopy in patients with diverticulitis compared with CRC screening.
Using data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium registry, we performed a cross-sectional study with patients ≥40 years old undergoing outpatient colonoscopy for an indication of diverticulitis follow-up evaluation or CRC screening. The primary outcome was CRC. The secondary outcome was advanced colorectal neoplasia. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated.
We identified 4,591,921 outpatient colonoscopies performed for screening and 91,993 colonoscopies for diverticulitis follow-up evaluation. CRC prevalence was 0.33% in colonoscopies for screening and 0.31% in colonoscopies for diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). CRC prevalence decreased to 0.17% in colonoscopies performed for diverticulitis only. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis as the only indication were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.68). CRC prevalence increased to 1.43% in patients with complicated diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with complicated diverticulitis were more likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.59-8.01).
The risk of CRC cancer is low in most patients with diverticulitis. Patients with complicated diverticulitis are the exception. Our results suggest that colonoscopy to detect missed CRC should include diverticulitis patients with a complication and those not current with CRC screening.
在出现憩室炎后,通常建议进行结肠镜检查以排除遗漏的结直肠癌(CRC)。 这一建议是基于有限证据提出的,存在争议。 我们估计在憩室炎患者中进行结肠镜检查时 CRC 和高级结直肠肿瘤的发生率与 CRC 筛查相比。
我们利用胃肠道质量改进联盟登记处的数据,对 40 岁以上接受门诊结肠镜检查以评估憩室炎随访或 CRC 筛查的患者进行了一项横断面研究。 主要结果是 CRC。 次要结果是高级结直肠肿瘤。 计算了比值比(OR)和 95%CI。
我们发现 4591921 例用于筛查的门诊结肠镜检查和 91993 例用于憩室炎随访评估的结肠镜检查。 在筛查结肠镜检查中 CRC 的发生率为 0.33%,在憩室炎结肠镜检查中为 0.31%。 与筛查相比,憩室炎患者发生 CRC 的可能性较小(调整后的 OR,0.84;95%CI,0.74-0.94)。 在仅进行憩室炎的结肠镜检查中,CRC 的发生率降至 0.17%。 与筛查相比,只有憩室炎作为唯一指征的患者发生 CRC 的可能性较小(调整后的 OR,0.49;95%CI,0.36-0.68)。 在患有复杂憩室炎的患者中,CRC 的发生率增加至 1.43%。 与筛查相比,患有复杂憩室炎的患者发生 CRC 的可能性更大(调整后的 OR,3.57;95%CI,1.59-8.01)。
大多数憩室炎患者发生 CRC 的风险较低。 患有复杂憩室炎的患者则是例外。 我们的结果表明,为了发现遗漏的 CRC,进行结肠镜检查应包括患有并发症的憩室炎患者和未进行 CRC 筛查的患者。