Koseoglu Merve, Ramachandran Remya Ampadi, Ozdemir Hatice, Ariani Maretaningtias Dwi, Bayindir Funda, Sukotjo Cortino
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sakarya, Sakarya, Turkey and Ph.D student, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ataturk, Erzurum, Turkey.
Fellow (Postdoc), 1DATA Consortium, Computational Comparative Medicine, Department of Mathematics, K- State Olathe, Olathe, Kansas.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr 25. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.007.
Information regarding facial landmark measurement using machine learning (ML) techniques in prosthodontics is lacking.
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the reliability, validity, and accuracy of facial anthropological measurements using both manual and ML landmark detection techniques.
Two-dimensional (2D) frontal full-face photographs of 50 men and 50 women were made. The interpupillary width (IPW), interlateral canthus width (LCW), intermedial canthus width (MCW), interalar width (IAW), and intercommissural width (ICW) were measured on 2D digital images using manual and ML methods. The automated measurements were recorded using a programming language (Python), and a convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to detect human facial landmarks. The obtained data from the manual and ML methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and the Pearson correlation analysis (α=.05).
Intrarater and interrater reliability values were greater than 0.90, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between the manual and ML measurements of IPW, MCW, IAW, and ICW was 0.02 mm, while it was 0.01 mm for LCW. No statistically significant differences were found between the measurements obtained by the manual and ML methods (P>.05). Highly significant positive correlations (P<.001) were obtained between the results of the manual and ML methods: (r=0.996[IPW], r=0.977[LCW], r=0.944[MCW], r=0.965[IAW], and r=0.997[ICW]).
In the field of prosthodontics, the use of ML methods provides a reliable alternative to manual digital techniques for carrying out facial anthropometric measurements.
在口腔修复学中,缺乏关于使用机器学习(ML)技术进行面部标志点测量的信息。
本研究的目的是评估和比较使用手动和ML标志点检测技术进行面部人类学测量的可靠性、有效性和准确性。
拍摄了50名男性和50名女性的二维(2D)正面全脸照片。使用手动和ML方法在2D数字图像上测量瞳孔间宽度(IPW)、外眦间距(LCW)、内眦间距(MCW)、鼻翼间距(IAW)和口角间距(ICW)。使用编程语言(Python)记录自动测量结果,并训练卷积神经网络(CNN)模型来检测人类面部标志点。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、配对样本t检验、Bland-Altman图和Pearson相关分析(α = 0.05)对从手动和ML方法获得的数据进行分析。
同一评估者和不同评估者的可靠性值均大于0.90,表明可靠性极佳。IPW、MCW、IAW和ICW的手动测量和ML测量之间的平均差异为0.02mm,而LCW为0.01mm。手动和ML方法获得的测量结果之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。手动和ML方法的结果之间获得了高度显著的正相关(P<0.001):(r = 0.996[IPW],r = 0.977[LCW],r = 0.944[MCW],r = 0.965[IAW],r = 0.997[ICW])。
在口腔修复学领域,使用ML方法为进行面部人体测量提供了一种可靠的替代手动数字技术的方法。