Roberts Sarah C M, Taylor Kimá Joy, Alexander Karen, Goodman Daisy, Martinez Noelle, Terplan Mishka
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Anka Consulting, LLC., Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 26;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00466-6.
Health care providers are a key source of reports of infants to child welfare related to birthing people's substance use. Many of these reports are overreports, or reports that exceed what is legally mandated, and reflect racial bias. We developed and evaluated a webinar for health professionals to address overreporting related to birthing people's substance use.
This evaluation study collected data from health professionals registering to participate in a professional education webinar about pregnancy, substance use, and child welfare reporting. It collected baseline data upon webinar registration, immediate post-webinar data, and 6 month follow-up data. Differences in both pre-post-and 6 month follow-up data were used to examine changes from before to after the webinars in beliefs, attitudes, and practices related to pregnant and birthing people who use drugs and child welfare reporting.
592 nurses, social workers, physicians, public health professionals, and other health professionals completed the baseline survey. More than half of those completing the baseline survey (n = 307, 52%) completed one or both follow-up surveys. We observed statistically significant changes in five of the eleven opioid attitudes/beliefs and in four of the nine child welfare attitudes/beliefs from baseline to follow-ups, and few changes in "control statements," i.e. beliefs we did not expect to change based on webinar participation. All of the changes were in the direction of less support for child welfare reporting. In particular, the proportion agreeing with the main evaluation outcome of "I would rather err on the side of overreporting to child welfare than underreporting to child welfare" decreased from 41% at baseline to 28% and 31% post-webinar and at 6-month follow up (p = 0.001). In addition, fewer participants endorsed reporting everyone at the 6 month follow-up than at baseline (12% to 22%) and more participants endorsed reporting no one at the 6-month follow-up than at baseline (28% to 18%), p = 0.013.
Webinars on the legal, scientific, and ethical aspects of reporting that are co-developed with people with lived experience may be a path to reducing health professional overreporting to child welfare related to birthing people's substance use.
医疗保健提供者是向儿童福利机构报告与分娩者药物使用相关的婴儿情况的关键信息来源。其中许多报告属于过度报告,即超出法律规定的报告,且反映了种族偏见。我们为卫生专业人员开发并评估了一个网络研讨会,以解决与分娩者药物使用相关的过度报告问题。
这项评估研究收集了注册参加关于怀孕、药物使用和儿童福利报告的专业教育网络研讨会的卫生专业人员的数据。在网络研讨会注册时收集基线数据,在网络研讨会结束后立即收集数据,并在6个月后进行随访数据收集。前后数据和6个月随访数据的差异用于研究网络研讨会前后在与使用药物的孕妇和分娩者及儿童福利报告相关的信念、态度和行为方面的变化。
592名护士、社会工作者、医生、公共卫生专业人员和其他卫生专业人员完成了基线调查。完成基线调查的人中超过一半(n = 307,52%)完成了一项或两项随访调查。从基线到随访,我们观察到11种阿片类药物态度/信念中的5种以及9种儿童福利态度/信念中的4种有统计学上的显著变化,而“对照陈述”(即我们预计不会因参加网络研讨会而改变的信念)几乎没有变化。所有变化都朝着减少对儿童福利报告支持的方向发展。特别是,同意“我宁愿偏向于向儿童福利机构过度报告也不愿少报告”这一主要评估结果的比例从基线时的41%降至网络研讨会后和6个月随访时的28%和31%(p = 0.001)。此外,在6个月随访时认可报告所有人的参与者比基线时更少(12%对22%),而在6个月随访时认可不报告任何人的参与者比基线时更多(28%对18%),p = 0.013。
与有实际生活经验的人共同开发的关于报告的法律、科学和伦理方面的网络研讨会可能是减少卫生专业人员向儿童福利机构过度报告与分娩者药物使用相关情况的一条途径。