RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.
School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Addiction. 2022 Jan;117(1):162-171. doi: 10.1111/add.15602. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
To estimate the association between punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy and odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosis among Medicaid-insured infants, and to estimate this association controlling for the presence of four other policies related to substance use in pregnancy.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of live births in Medicaid claims data from 39 US states in varying years between 2006 and 2014 using weighted generalized linear models with clustered standard errors and state and year fixed-effects.
NAS rates in states without punitive policies were compared with rates in states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and including state and year fixed-effects. We estimated odds of NAS controlling for the presence of a potentially treatment-deterring policy requiring reporting of suspected prenatal substance use, and three treatment-supportive policies that create targeted programs for pregnant and postpartum women, prioritize pregnant women's access to substance use disorder treatment programs and prohibit discrimination towards pregnant women in treatment programs.
Among 9 714 798 weighted live births (1 896 082 unweighted), 49 670 (0.51%) had an NAS diagnosis. The findings were inconclusive as to whether or not punitive policies were associated with odds of NAS either in the short or long term. Odds of NAS among infants born in states with reporting policies were lower than those born in states without such policies [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.98].
In the United States, punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy do not appear to be associated with lower odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Reporting policies, which are heterogenous in their components and implementation, appear to be associated with lower odds of NAS when controlling for other relevant policies.
评估针对孕期滥用物质的妇女实施惩罚性政策与医疗补助保险婴儿中新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)诊断之间的关联,并在控制与孕期物质使用相关的其他四项政策的情况下,评估这种关联。
设计、地点和参与者:利用加权广义线性模型,采用具有聚类标准误差和州和年份固定效应的方法,对 2006 年至 2014 年期间来自 39 个美国州的医疗补助索赔数据中的活产数据进行分析。
使用逻辑回归模型,根据个体和县级因素进行调整,并包括州和年份固定效应,比较无惩罚性政策的州与政策颁布前后的州的 NAS 发生率。我们估计了在存在潜在治疗抑制政策(要求报告疑似产前物质使用)和三项治疗支持政策(为孕妇和产后妇女制定有针对性的计划,优先考虑孕妇获得物质使用障碍治疗计划,并禁止在治疗计划中对孕妇进行歧视)的情况下,NAS 的可能性。
在 9714798 名加权活产儿中(1896082 名未加权),有 49670 名(0.51%)患有 NAS 诊断。无论是短期还是长期,惩罚性政策与 NAS 发生几率之间的关联都没有定论。在有报告政策的州出生的婴儿发生 NAS 的几率低于没有此类政策的州(调整后的比值比[aOR] = 0.77,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.61-0.98)。
在美国,针对孕期滥用物质的妇女实施惩罚性政策似乎与降低新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)的几率无关。报告政策在其组成部分和实施方面存在异质性,在控制其他相关政策的情况下,与降低 NAS 几率相关。