Ismail Ahmed Mahmoud, Raza Muhammad Hassan, Zahra Naseem, Ahmad Rafiq, Sajjad Yasar, Khan Sabaz Ali
Department of Arid Land Agriculture, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Pests and Plant Diseases Unit, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;14(4):535. doi: 10.3390/life14040535.
Wheat ( L.) is an essential food crop in terms of consumption as well as production. Aflatoxin exposure has a widespread public health impact in economically developing nations, so there is a need to establish preventive techniques for these high-risk populations. Pre-harvest and post-harvest practices are the two strategies used to control aflatoxin contamination, which include the use of genetically modified crops that show resistance against infection, the use of pesticides, changing the planting and harvesting time of crops, and physical, chemical, and biological methods. In this research, aflatoxin detection and quantification were performed in different wheat varieties to determine quantitative differences in comparison to the European Commission's limit of 4 ppb aflatoxins in wheat. TLC for qualitative and the ELISA kit method for quantitative analysis of aflatoxins were used. Out of 56 samples, 35 were found contaminated with aflatoxins, while the remaining 21 samples did not show any presence of aflatoxins. Out of the 35 contaminated samples, 20 samples showed aflatoxin contamination within the permissible limit, while the remaining 15 samples showed aflatoxin concentration beyond the permissible level, ranging from 0.49 to 20.56 ppb. After quantification, the nine highly contaminated wheat samples were detoxified using physical, chemical, and biological methods. The efficiency of these methods was assessed, and they showed a significant reduction in aflatoxins of 53-72%, 79-88%, and 80-88%, respectively. In conclusion, the difference in aflatoxin concentration in different wheat varieties could be due to genetic variations. Furthermore, biological treatment could be the method of choice for detoxification of aflatoxins in wheat as it greatly reduced the aflatoxin concentration with no harmful effect on the quality of the grains.
小麦(L.)在消费和生产方面都是一种重要的粮食作物。黄曲霉毒素暴露在经济发展中国家对公众健康有着广泛的影响,因此有必要为这些高危人群建立预防技术。收获前和收获后的措施是用于控制黄曲霉毒素污染的两种策略,包括使用对感染具有抗性的转基因作物、使用杀虫剂、改变作物的种植和收获时间,以及物理、化学和生物学方法。在本研究中,对不同小麦品种进行了黄曲霉毒素检测和定量,以确定与欧盟委员会规定的小麦中黄曲霉毒素限量4 ppb相比的定量差异。使用薄层层析法进行黄曲霉毒素的定性分析,酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒法进行定量分析。在56个样本中,有35个被发现受到黄曲霉毒素污染,而其余21个样本未显示任何黄曲霉毒素的存在。在35个受污染的样本中,20个样本的黄曲霉毒素污染在允许限度内,而其余15个样本的黄曲霉毒素浓度超出允许水平,范围为0.49至20.56 ppb。定量后,使用物理、化学和生物学方法对9个高度污染的小麦样本进行了脱毒处理。评估了这些方法的效率,结果表明它们分别使黄曲霉毒素显著降低了53 - 72%、79 - 88%和80 - 88%。总之,不同小麦品种中黄曲霉毒素浓度的差异可能是由于基因变异。此外,生物处理可能是小麦中黄曲霉毒素脱毒的首选方法,因为它能大幅降低黄曲霉毒素浓度,且对谷物质量没有有害影响。