• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗的膀胱癌患者癌症特异性生存率的新型决策树模型。

A Novel Decision Tree Model for Predicting the Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radical Cystectomy.

作者信息

Sarrio-Sanz Pau, Martinez-Cayuelas Laura, Beltran-Perez Abraham, Muñoz-Montoya Milagros, Segura-Heras Jose-Vicente, Gil-Guillen Vicente F, Gomez-Perez Luis

机构信息

Urology Services, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Public Health, Science History and Gynaecology Department, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 10;13(8):2177. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082177.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13082177
PMID:38673449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11050271/
Abstract

: The aim was to develop a decision tree and a new prognostic tool to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with urothelial bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. : A total of 11,834 patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy between 2004 and 2019 from the SEER database were randomly split into the derivation ( = 7889) and validation cohorts ( = 3945). Survival curves were estimated using conditional decision tree analysis. We used Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations for the treatment of missing values and the pec package to compare the predictive performance. We extracted data from our model following CHARMS and assessed the risk of bias and applicability with PROBAST. : A total of 4824 (41%) patients died during the follow-up period due to bladder cancer. A decision tree was made and 12 groups were obtained. Patients with a higher AJCC stage and older age have a worse prognosis. The risk groups were summarized into high, intermediate and low risk. The integrated Brier scores between 0 and 191 months for the bootstrap estimates of the prediction error are the lowest for our conditional survival tree (0.189). The model showed a low risk of bias and low concern about applicability. The results must be externally validated. : Decision tree analysis is a useful tool with significant discrimination. With this tool, we were able to stratify patients into 12 subgroups and 3 risk groups with a low risk of bias and low concern about applicability.

摘要

目的是开发一种决策树和一种新的预后工具,以预测接受根治性膀胱切除术的尿路上皮膀胱癌患者的癌症特异性生存率。:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中选取了2004年至2019年间接受根治性膀胱切除术的11834例膀胱癌患者,随机分为推导队列(n = 7889)和验证队列(n = 3945)。使用条件决策树分析估计生存曲线。我们使用链式方程多重填补法处理缺失值,并使用pec软件包比较预测性能。我们按照CHARMS从模型中提取数据,并使用PROBAST评估偏倚风险和适用性。:共有4824例(41%)患者在随访期间死于膀胱癌。构建了一个决策树,得到了12个组。美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期较高和年龄较大的患者预后较差。风险组被总结为高、中、低风险。对于预测误差的自举估计,我们的条件生存树在0至191个月之间的综合Brier评分最低(0.189)。该模型显示偏倚风险较低,对适用性的担忧也较低。结果必须进行外部验证。:决策树分析是一种具有显著区分能力的有用工具。使用该工具,我们能够将患者分为12个亚组和3个风险组,偏倚风险低,对适用性的担忧也低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/c3c5b59a295d/jcm-13-02177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/f2f383986139/jcm-13-02177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/6b1734780225/jcm-13-02177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/c3c5b59a295d/jcm-13-02177-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/f2f383986139/jcm-13-02177-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/6b1734780225/jcm-13-02177-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35c/11050271/c3c5b59a295d/jcm-13-02177-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Decision Tree Model for Predicting the Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radical Cystectomy.一种用于预测接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗的膀胱癌患者癌症特异性生存率的新型决策树模型。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 10;13(8):2177. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082177.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer:A population-based study.基于人群的研究:开发和验证用于预测膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术后癌症特异性生存的预后列线图。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(24):9303-9314. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3535. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Predictive Value of the Log Odds of Negative Lymph Nodes/T Stage as a Novel Prognostic Factor in Bladder Cancer Patients After Radical Cystectomy.阴性淋巴结对数比值/T分期作为根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者新的预后因素的预测价值。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 19;12:895413. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.895413. eCollection 2022.
4
Mortality prediction models after radical cystectomy for bladder tumour: A systematic review and critical appraisal.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌后的死亡率预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Oct;52(10):e13822. doi: 10.1111/eci.13822. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
How cancer-specific mortality changes over time after radical cystectomy: Conditional survival of patients with nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder.根治性膀胱切除术后癌症特异性死亡率随时间如何变化:非转移性膀胱尿路上皮癌患者的条件生存情况。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Dec;37(12):893-899. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Prediction of cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy in pT4a urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: development of a tool for clinical decision-making.pT4a期膀胱尿路上皮癌根治性膀胱切除术后癌症特异性生存的预测:一种临床决策工具的开发
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):272-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12984. Epub 2015 May 24.
7
The SPARC score: a multifactorial outcome prediction model for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.SPARC 评分:用于膀胱癌根治性切除术患者的多因素预后预测模型。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2005-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.022. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
The Cancer of the Bladder Risk Assessment (COBRA) score for estimating cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy: external validation in a large bi-institutional cohort.膀胱癌风险评估(COBRA)评分用于估计根治性膀胱切除术后的癌症特异性生存:大型双机构队列的外部验证。
BJU Int. 2020 Dec;126(6):704-714. doi: 10.1111/bju.15163. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
The Cancer of the Bladder Risk Assessment (COBRA) score for predicting cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: External validation in a cohort of Korean patients.膀胱癌风险评估(COBRA)评分预测膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后癌症特异性生存:韩国患者队列的外部验证。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;37(7):470-477. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
The Cancer of the Bladder Risk Assessment (COBRA) score: Estimating mortality after radical cystectomy.膀胱癌风险评估(COBRA)评分:评估根治性膀胱切除术后的死亡率。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4574-4582. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30918. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing Predictive Analytics to Understand Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) Variations in Adults With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury.利用预测分析了解成人获得性脊髓损伤患者的神经源性膀胱症状评分(NBSS)变化
Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Sep;44(7):1466-1473. doi: 10.1002/nau.70116. Epub 2025 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radical Cystectomy: A Single High-Volume Center Experience.新辅助化疗对接受根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者围手术期结局的影响:单一大容量中心经验
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 16;14(2):212. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020212.
2
Advances in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.膀胱癌的诊断与治疗进展。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 12;384:e076743. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076743.
3
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
4
Disparities and Trends in Genitourinary Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the USA.美国泌尿生殖系统癌症发病率和死亡率的差异和趋势。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.023. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Development of a Pocket Nomogram to Predict Cancer and Disease Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy For Bladder Cancer: The CRAB Nomogram.用于预测膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后癌症及疾病特异性生存率的袖珍列线图的开发:CRAB列线图
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Feb;21(1):108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Mortality prediction models after radical cystectomy for bladder tumour: A systematic review and critical appraisal.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌后的死亡率预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2022 Oct;52(10):e13822. doi: 10.1111/eci.13822. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
7
Cox model and decision trees: an application to breast cancer data.Cox模型与决策树:在乳腺癌数据中的应用
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Mar 23;46:e17. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.17. eCollection 2022.
8
Mortality Trends Related to Bladder Cancer in Spain, 1999-2018.1999 - 2018年西班牙膀胱癌相关死亡率趋势
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 10;11(4):930. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040930.
9
The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers.2020 年欧洲癌症负担:40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的发病率和死亡率估计。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:308-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.