Suppr超能文献

一种通过烘焙评估从各种生物质制备高质量燃料的优化方法。

An Optimized Method for Evaluating the Preparation of High-Quality Fuel from Various Types of Biomass through Torrefaction.

作者信息

Guo Shuai, Deng Xiaoyan, Zhao Deng, Zhu Shujun, Qu Hongwei, Li Xingcan, Zhao Yan

机构信息

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China.

Shanxi Key Laboratory of Coal Flexible Combustion and Thermal Conversion, Datong 037000, China.

出版信息

Molecules. 2024 Apr 21;29(8):1889. doi: 10.3390/molecules29081889.

Abstract

The pretreatment for torrefaction impacts the performance of biomass fuels and operational costs. Given their diversity, it is crucial to determine the optimal torrefaction conditions for different types of biomass. In this study, three typical solid biofuels, corn stover (CS), agaric fungus bran (AFB), and spent coffee grounds (SCGs), were prepared using fluidized bed torrefaction. The thermal stability of different fuels was extensively discussed and a novel comprehensive fuel index, "displacement level", was analyzed. The functional groups, pore structures, and microstructural differences between the three raw materials and the optimally torrefied biochar were thoroughly characterized. Finally, the biomass fuel consumption for household heating and water supply was calculated. The results showed that the optimal torrefaction temperatures for CS, AFB, and SCGs were 240, 280, and 280 °C, respectively, with comprehensive quality rankings of the optimal torrefied biochar of AFB (260) > SCG (252) > CS (248). Additionally, the economic costs of the optimally torrefied biochar were reduced by 7.03-19.32%. The results indicated that the displacement level is an index universally applicable to the preparation of solid fuels through biomass torrefaction. AFB is the most suitable solid fuel to be upgraded through torrefaction and has the potential to replace coal.

摘要

热解预处理会影响生物质燃料的性能和运营成本。鉴于生物质的多样性,确定不同类型生物质的最佳热解条件至关重要。在本研究中,使用流化床热解制备了三种典型的固体生物燃料,即玉米秸秆(CS)、木耳菌糠(AFB)和咖啡渣(SCGs)。广泛讨论了不同燃料的热稳定性,并分析了一种新的综合燃料指标“置换水平”。对三种原料与最佳热解生物炭之间的官能团、孔隙结构和微观结构差异进行了全面表征。最后,计算了家庭供热和供水的生物质燃料消耗量。结果表明,CS、AFB和SCGs的最佳热解温度分别为240、280和280°C,最佳热解生物炭的综合质量排名为AFB(260)>SCG(252)>CS(248)。此外,最佳热解生物炭的经济成本降低了7.03-19.32%。结果表明,置换水平是一个普遍适用于通过生物质热解制备固体燃料的指标。AFB是最适合通过热解升级的固体燃料,具有替代煤炭的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e1/11054910/6739f015917c/molecules-29-01889-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验