Suppr超能文献

共病指数作为频繁严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的预测指标的可靠性。

Reliability of comorbidity indices as predictive indicators for frequent severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.

作者信息

Doğan Mülazimoğlu Deniz, Bilgin Bilge, Ayöz Sümeyye, Arslan Fatma, Şen Elif

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.

Department of Chest Diseases, Sakarya Research and Training Hospital, Sakarya, Türkiye.

出版信息

Tuberk Toraks. 2024 Mar;72(1):16-24. doi: 10.5578/tt.202401833.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is two-sided. As the number of comorbidities increases, frequency of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) consequently increases. Comorbidity indices can be used to evaluate comorbidities while managing COPD patients. We aimed to compare comorbidity indices such as the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), comorbidities in COPD index (COMCOLD) and COPD specific comorbidity test (COTE) regarding exacerbation frequency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants hospitalized for AECOPD were included in this bidirectional case-control study. Exacerbation severity, frequency, further exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period and CCI, COMCOLD, and COTE scores were recorded. High and low comorbidity groups were compared regarding AECOPD frequency, severity, and further exacerbations.

RESULT

Ninety-two patients were enrolled. The frequency of AECOPD was significantly higher in high-comorbidity groups (p= 0.026 for CCI; 0.015 for COTE; 0.012 for COMCOLD) than that in low-comorbidity groups. Severe AECOPD was significantly higher in all high-comorbidity groups according to the indices. Median number of exacerbations during the one-year follow-up period was significantly higher in the high-comorbidity groups defined by CCI [0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-4), p<0.001 and COMCOLD 0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-3), p= 0.007].

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidities are among the most important risk factors for AECOPD. Managing comorbidities begins with their identification, followed by appropriate interventions. Therefore, using at least one comorbidity index during assessment ensures that comorbidities are not overlooked during diagnostic and therapeutic processes. CCI, COTE, and COMCOLD comorbidity indices can be used in predicting COPD exacerbations.

摘要

引言

合并症与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)之间的关系是双向的。随着合并症数量的增加,COPD急性加重(AECOPD)的频率也随之增加。在管理COPD患者时,合并症指数可用于评估合并症。我们旨在比较诸如查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、COPD合并症指数(COMCOLD)和COPD特异性合并症检测(COTE)等合并症指数与急性加重频率的关系。

材料与方法

因AECOPD住院的参与者纳入了这项双向病例对照研究。记录急性加重的严重程度、频率、一年随访期内的再次急性加重情况以及CCI、COMCOLD和COTE评分。比较高合并症组和低合并症组在AECOPD频率、严重程度和再次急性加重方面的情况。

结果

共纳入92例患者。高合并症组的AECOPD频率显著高于低合并症组(CCI为p = 0.026;COTE为0.015;COMCOLD为0.012)。根据这些指数,所有高合并症组的重度AECOPD显著更高。CCI定义的高合并症组在一年随访期内急性加重次数的中位数显著更高[0(0 - 4)对1(0 - 4),p < 0.001],COMCOLD定义的高合并症组也是如此[0(0 - 4)对1(0 - 3),p = 0.007]。

结论

合并症是AECOPD最重要的危险因素之一。管理合并症首先要识别它们,然后进行适当干预。因此,在评估过程中使用至少一种合并症指数可确保在诊断和治疗过程中不会忽视合并症。CCI、COTE和COMCOLD合并症指数可用于预测COPD急性加重。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验