• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endobronchial coil lung volume reduction performed on patients with emphysema dominant COPD: Long term follow-up results.对以肺气肿为主的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行支气管内线圈肺减容术:长期随访结果。
Tuberk Toraks. 2024 Mar;72(1):37-47. doi: 10.5578/tt.202401834.
2
Real life results of coil treatment for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in emphysema.支气管镜下肺减容术治疗肺气肿的线圈治疗的实际临床效果。
Tuberk Toraks. 2020 Mar;68(1):17-24. doi: 10.5578/tt.69320.
3
Evaluation of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment results in patients with severe emphysema.重度肺气肿患者支气管镜下肺减容线圈治疗效果评估
Clin Respir J. 2017 Sep;11(5):585-592. doi: 10.1111/crj.12387. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
4
[Bronchoscopic treatments for COPD].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病的支气管镜治疗]
Nihon Rinsho. 2016 May;74(5):807-12.
5
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗严重非均质性肺气肿患者。
Chest. 2012 Sep;142(3):574-582. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0730.
6
Effectiveness of endobronchial coil treatment for lung volume reduction in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema and bilateral incomplete fissures: a six-month follow-up.支气管内线圈治疗对重度异质性肺气肿和双侧不完全性肺裂患者肺减容的有效性:六个月随访
Respiration. 2014;88(1):52-60. doi: 10.1159/000358441. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.预测晚期肺气肿患者对支气管内线圈治疗反应的因素。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction procedures for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的支气管镜下肺减容术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD012158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012158.pub2.
9
Coil therapy for patients with severe emphysema and bilateral incomplete fissures - effectiveness and complications after 1-year follow-up: a single-center experience.重度肺气肿和双侧不完全性肺裂患者的线圈治疗——1年随访后的有效性和并发症:单中心经验
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jan 23;12:383-394. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S117655. eCollection 2017.
10
Importance of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil therapy in potential candidates for lung transplantation.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗对肺移植潜在候选人的重要性。
Biosci Trends. 2018 Sep 19;12(4):395-402. doi: 10.5582/bst.2018.01134. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Extrapulmonary effects of lung volume reduction in severe emphysema: a systematic review.重度肺气肿肺减容术的肺外效应:一项系统评价
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Apr 2;34(176). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0258-2024. Print 2025 Apr.

对以肺气肿为主的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行支气管内线圈肺减容术:长期随访结果。

Endobronchial coil lung volume reduction performed on patients with emphysema dominant COPD: Long term follow-up results.

作者信息

Ensarioğlu Kerem, Kurt Bahar

机构信息

Clinic of Pulmonary Diseases, Ankara Atatürk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Clinic of Pulmonary Diseases, Ankara Etlik State Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Tuberk Toraks. 2024 Mar;72(1):37-47. doi: 10.5578/tt.202401834.

DOI:10.5578/tt.202401834
PMID:38676593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390087/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a commonly seen, preventable, and treatable disease with permanent respiratory symptoms and air entrapment that is caused by particle exposure. In case of limited response to traditional treatment protocols, lung volume reduction may be performed in patients with emphysema dominant patterns. In this study, long term follow-up results of the patients who had been operated on by minimal invasive bronchoscopic lung volume reduction surgery by coil placement were reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of the patients operated on by coil placement were retrospectively investigated, and pulmonary function test (PFT), echocardiography (ECHO), six-minute walking test (6MWT), tomography images, ventilation scintigraphy, and clinical summaries were evaluated. Out of 34 initial candidates, 18 patients were included in the study. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's rho were utilized to compare interventions and follow-up testing.

RESULT

The average age of 18 patients was 62 (50-74) years, and except for one patient, all were males (n= 17). Fifteen patients were operated bilaterally, and the rest were unilaterally operated, with an average of 10 coils placed per coil placement. An average of 90 days was between bronchoscopic coil placement, with a follow-up duration of 45 days in between. Mean total follow-up duration was 794 (± 424) days. Pneumonia and pneumonitis were seen in 33% of patients within the first month. Mortality from respiratory causes was found to be 11%, while mortality from all causes was found to be 22%. Statistical difference was observed regarding 6MWT after bronchoscopic volume reduction when compared the initial preoperative values. However, this difference was later lost statistically at the second follow-up performed after the completion of both sides. A benefit in improved resting saturation was observed after the second procedure, which was not evident after unilateral intervention. However, similiar to 6MWT, this benefit was lost at the second follow-up, with resting saturation instead being effected negatively. No difference was observed in PFT results; however, a correlation was seen between FEV1 and walking distance. No specific correlation had been seen in the ECHO evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits regarding 6MWT and resting saturation were observed in patients undergoing minimal invasive bronchoscopic lung volume reduction surgery with coils. This benefit was evident in the short term but was lost as the follow-up duration increased. A relatively high morbidity and mortality rate was also present, further stating the risky nature of pulmonary intervention, even minimally invasive procedures, on patients with COPD.

摘要

引言

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种常见的、可预防和可治疗的疾病,具有永久性呼吸症状和因接触颗粒物导致的气体潴留。在对传统治疗方案反应有限的情况下,对于以肺气肿为主型的患者可进行肺减容术。本研究报告了接受经支气管镜微创肺减容术(通过放置线圈)治疗的患者的长期随访结果。

材料与方法

回顾性研究接受线圈置入手术患者的记录,并评估肺功能测试(PFT)、超声心动图(ECHO)、六分钟步行试验(6MWT)、断层扫描图像、通气闪烁扫描及临床总结。在34名初始候选患者中,18名患者纳入研究。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Spearman秩相关系数来比较干预措施和随访测试结果。

结果

18名患者的平均年龄为62(50 - 74)岁,除1名患者外,均为男性(n = 17)。15名患者接受双侧手术,其余患者接受单侧手术,每次线圈置入平均放置10个线圈。两次支气管镜线圈置入的平均间隔时间为90天,两次置入之间的随访时间为45天。平均总随访时间为794(±424)天。33%的患者在第一个月内出现肺炎和肺炎性病变。呼吸原因导致的死亡率为11%,全因死亡率为22%。与术前初始值相比,支气管镜肺减容术后6MWT有统计学差异。然而,在双侧手术完成后的第二次随访中,这种差异在统计学上消失。第二次手术后观察到静息饱和度有所改善,单侧干预后不明显。然而,与6MWT情况类似,这种益处在第二次随访时消失,静息饱和度反而受到负面影响。PFT结果无差异;然而,FEV1与步行距离之间存在相关性。ECHO评估未发现特定相关性。

结论

接受经支气管镜微创肺减容术(通过放置线圈)的患者在6MWT和静息饱和度方面有获益。这种益处在短期内明显,但随着随访时间延长而消失。还存在相对较高的发病率和死亡率,进一步说明对COPD患者进行肺部干预(即使是微创手术)具有风险性。