Division of Community Internal Medicine (D.K.P., J.J.S.), Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Medicine (W.L.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
Pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with serious illness and often requires interventional approaches for adequate treatment. Little is known about referral patterns and collaborative attitudes of palliative physicians regarding pain management specialists.
To evaluate referral rates, co-management strategies, and beliefs of palliative physicians about the value of Pain Medicine specialists in patients with serious illness.
A 30-question survey with demographic, referral/practice, and attitudes/belief questions was mailed to 1000 AAHPM physician members. Responses were characterized with descriptive statistics and further analyzed for associations between training experiences, practice environment, and educational activities with collaborative practice patterns and beliefs.
The response rate was 52.6%. Most survey respondents had initial board certification primarily in internal medicine (n = 286, 56%) or family medicine (n = 144, 28%). A minority of respondents had completed a formal ABMS Hospice and Palliative Medicine fellowship (n = 178, 34%). Respondents had been in practice for a median of nine years, (range 1-38 years) primarily in community hospitals (n = 249, 47%) or academic hospitals (n = 202, 38%). The variables best associated with collaborative practices and attitudes was practice in an academic hospital setting and participation in regular joint academic conferences with pain medicine clinicians.
This study shows that Palliative Care physicians have highly positive attitudes toward Pain Medicine specialists, but referrals remain low. Facilitating professional collaboration via joint educational/clinical sessions is one possible solution to drive ongoing interprofessional care in patients with complex pain.
疼痛是重病患者常见的症状,通常需要介入治疗。对于姑息治疗医师对疼痛管理专家的转诊模式和合作态度,人们知之甚少。
评估姑息治疗医师对严重疾病患者的疼痛管理专家的转诊率、共同管理策略和看法。
向 1000 名 AAHPM 医师成员邮寄了一份包含人口统计学、转诊/实践以及态度/信念问题的 30 个问题的调查。使用描述性统计对回答进行了描述,并进一步分析了培训经历、实践环境和教育活动与合作实践模式和信念之间的关系。
回复率为 52.6%。大多数调查受访者最初的专业委员会认证主要是内科(n = 286,56%)或家庭医学(n = 144,28%)。少数受访者完成了正规的 ABMS 姑息医学和临终关怀医学研究员培训(n = 178,34%)。受访者的行医中位数为九年(范围 1-38 年),主要在社区医院(n = 249,47%)或学术医院(n = 202,38%)。与合作实践和态度最相关的变量是在学术医院环境中执业以及定期与疼痛医学临床医生参加联合学术会议。
这项研究表明,姑息治疗医师对疼痛医学专家持有高度积极的态度,但转诊率仍然很低。通过联合教育/临床会议促进专业合作是推动复杂疼痛患者持续开展跨专业护理的一种可能方法。