Key Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the Peoples' Republic of China, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the Peoples' Republic of China, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jul;120(1):162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
It is unclear whether salivary iodine concentration (SIC) can assess iodine status in females from different water iodine regions.
Through a cross-sectional study, we explored the feasibility of SIC as a biomarker to assess iodine status in females and develop optimal cutoff values.
A total of 1991 females were analyzed in this cross-sectional study from the coastal iodine-deficient areas (CIDAs), inland iodine-deficient areas (IIDAs), iodine-adequate areas (IAAs), iodine-excess areas (IEAs), and iodine extra-high areas (IEHAs). SIC, spot urine iodine concentration (SUIC), and daily total iodine intake (TII) were assessed, and ultrasonography was performed in all subjects.
There was a positive correlation between SIC and SUIC (r = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.69; P < 0.001), and TII (r = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.50; P < 0.001). The prevalence of thyroid nodules (TN) showed an upward trend with SIC increasing (Z = -2.83; P-trend = 0.005). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for SIC to assess iodine deficiency was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.65; P < 0.001) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.77; P < 0.001) for iodine excess. The cutoff values were as follows: SIC < 93.32 μg/L, iodine deficiency; 93.32-224.60 μg/L, iodine adequacy; and >224.60 μg/L, iodine excess. When SIC > 224.60 μg/L, the odds ratio (OR) for UIC > 300 μg/L, excessive TII, and the prevalence of TN were 6.44, 3.68, and 1.27 (95% CI: 4.98, 8.31; 2.83, 4.79; and 1.02, 1.56, respectively; P < 0.05); when SIC < 93.32 μg/L, the OR for UIC < 100 μg/L and insufficient TII were 2.34 and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.73, 3.14 and 1.33, 2.83, respectively; P < 0.05).
Using SIC as a biomarker, females in CIDA exhibited mild iodine deficiency, those in IIDA and IAA demonstrated moderate iodine deficiency, and those in IEA and IEHA exhibited an excess of iodine, consistent with SUIC to assess iodine status. SIC can be used as a good biomarker to evaluate the iodine status in population.
目前尚不清楚唾液碘浓度(SIC)是否可用于评估不同水碘地区女性的碘营养状况。
通过横断面研究,我们探讨了 SIC 作为评估女性碘营养状况的生物标志物的可行性,并确定了最佳截断值。
本横断面研究共纳入 1991 名来自沿海碘缺乏地区(CIDAs)、内陆碘缺乏地区(IIDAs)、碘适宜地区(IAAs)、碘过量地区(IEAs)和碘超高地区(IEHAs)的女性。评估了 SIC、尿碘浓度(SUIC)和每日总碘摄入量(TII),并对所有受试者进行了超声检查。
SIC 与 SUIC(r = 0.67;95%置信区间:0.64,0.69;P < 0.001)和 TII(r = 0.47;95%置信区间:0.43,0.50;P < 0.001)呈正相关。甲状腺结节(TN)的患病率随 SIC 升高呈上升趋势(Z = -2.83;P-trend = 0.005)。SIC 评估碘缺乏的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为 0.62(95%置信区间:0.60,0.65;P < 0.001)和 0.75(95%置信区间:0.73,0.77;P < 0.001),碘过量。截断值如下:SIC < 93.32 μg/L,碘缺乏;93.32-224.60 μg/L,碘适宜;>224.60 μg/L,碘过量。当 SIC > 224.60 μg/L 时,UIC > 300 μg/L、TII 过量和 TN 患病率的比值比(OR)分别为 6.44、3.68 和 1.27(95%置信区间:4.98,8.31;2.83,4.79;1.02,1.56,P < 0.05);当 SIC < 93.32 μg/L 时,UIC < 100 μg/L 和 TII 不足的 OR 分别为 2.34 和 1.94(95%置信区间:1.73,3.14 和 1.33,2.83,P < 0.05)。
使用 SIC 作为生物标志物,CIDAs 中的女性表现为轻度碘缺乏,IIDAs 和 IAA 中的女性表现为中度碘缺乏,IEAs 和 IEHA 中的女性表现为碘过量,与 SUIC 评估碘营养状况一致。SIC 可作为评估人群碘营养状况的良好生物标志物。