Center for GeoGenetics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Laboratoire Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, UMR 8079, Bâtiment 680, 12 route RD128, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Division of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Trends Genet. 2024 Jul;40(7):564-579. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
Progressive recombination loss is a common feature of sex chromosomes. Yet, the evolutionary drivers of this phenomenon remain a mystery. For decades, differences in trait optima between sexes (sexual antagonism) have been the favoured hypothesis, but convincing evidence is lacking. Recent years have seen a surge of alternative hypotheses to explain progressive extensions and maintenance of recombination suppression: neutral accumulation of sequence divergence, selection of nonrecombining fragments with fewer deleterious mutations than average, sheltering of recessive deleterious mutations by linkage to heterozygous alleles, early evolution of dosage compensation, and constraints on recombination restoration. Here, we explain these recent hypotheses and dissect their assumptions, mechanisms, and predictions. We also review empirical studies that have brought support to the various hypotheses.
渐进性重组缺失是性染色体的一个共同特征。然而,这一现象的进化驱动力仍然是个谜。几十年来,性别之间性状最优差异(性拮抗)一直是首选假说,但缺乏令人信服的证据。近年来,出现了许多替代假说来解释重组抑制的渐进性扩展和维持:序列分歧的中性积累、选择非重组片段的有害突变平均少于平均水平、与杂合等位基因连锁的隐性有害突变的庇护、剂量补偿的早期进化,以及对重组恢复的限制。在这里,我们解释了这些最近的假说,并剖析了它们的假设、机制和预测。我们还回顾了支持各种假说的实证研究。