• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

L4-L5退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗后改善较慢及未改善的临床和影像学预测因素:初步结果

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Slower Improvement and Nonimprovement After Surgical Treatment of L4-L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Preliminary Results.

作者信息

Singh Sumedha, Shahi Pratyush, Song Junho, Subramanian Tejas, Morse Kyle, Maayan Omri, Araghi Kasra, Singh Nishtha, Tuma Olivia, Asada Tomoyuki, Korsun Maximilian, Mai Eric, Dowdell James, Sheha Evan, Sandhu Harvinder, Albert Todd, Qureshi Sheeraz, Iyer Sravisht

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery.

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Feb 1;50(3):187-195. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005019. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005019
PMID:38679887
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the predictors of slower and nonimprovement after surgical treatment of L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is limited evidence regarding clinical and radiologic predictors of slower and nonimprovement following surgery for L4-5 DLS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression or fusion for L4-5 DLS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Outcome measures were: (1) minimal clinically important difference (MCID), (2) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and (3) global rating change (GRC). Clinical variables analyzed for predictors were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgery type, comorbidities, anxiety, depression, smoking, osteoporosis, and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Oswestry disability index, ODI; visual analog scale, VAS back and leg; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS). Radiologic variables analyzed were slip percentage, translational and angular motion, facet diastasis/cyst/orientation, laterolisthesis, disc height, scoliosis, main and fractional curve Cobb angles, and spinopelvic parameters.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients (37% decompression and 63% fusion) were included. At less than three months, high pelvic tilt (PT) (OR: 0.92, P= 0.02) and depression (OR: 0.28, P= 0.02) were predictors of MCID nonachievement and GRC nonbetterment, respectively. Neither retained significance at above six months and hence, were identified as predictors of slower improvement. At above six months, low preoperative VAS leg (OR: 1.26, P= 0.01) and high facet orientation (OR: 0.95, P= 0.03) were predictors of MCID nonachievement, high L4-5 slip percentage (OR: 0.86, P= 0.03) and L5-S1 angular motion (OR: 0.78, P= 0.01) were predictors of GRC nonbetterment, and high preoperative ODI (OR: 0.96, P= 0.04) was a predictor of PASS nonachievement.

CONCLUSIONS

High PT and depression were predictors of slower improvement and low preoperative leg pain, high disability, high facet orientation, high slip percentage, and L5-S1 angular motion were predictors of nonimprovement. However, these are preliminary findings and further studies with homogeneous cohorts are required to establish these findings.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

确定L4 - 5节段退变性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)手术治疗后恢复缓慢及未改善的预测因素。

背景数据总结

关于L4 - 5 DLS手术后恢复缓慢及未改善的临床和放射学预测因素的证据有限。

方法

纳入接受L4 - 5 DLS微创减压或融合手术且随访至少1年的患者。结局指标包括:(1)最小临床重要差异(MCID),(2)患者可接受症状状态(PASS),(3)整体评分变化(GRC)。分析的预测因素的临床变量有年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、手术类型、合并症、焦虑、抑郁、吸烟、骨质疏松症以及术前患者报告结局指标(PROMs)(Oswestry功能障碍指数,ODI;视觉模拟量表,腰背痛和腿痛VAS;12项简明健康调查躯体成分评分,SF - 12 PCS)。分析的放射学变量有滑脱百分比、平移和角运动、关节突间隙/囊肿/方向、侧方滑脱、椎间盘高度、脊柱侧弯、主曲线和分曲线Cobb角以及脊柱骨盆参数。

结果

纳入233例患者(37%为减压手术,63%为融合手术)。在术后不到三个月时,高骨盆倾斜度(PT)(比值比:0.92,P = 0.02)和抑郁(比值比:0.28,P = 0.02)分别是未达到MCID和GRC未改善的预测因素。在术后六个月以上时,二者均无统计学意义,因此被确定为恢复缓慢的预测因素。在术后六个月以上时,术前腿痛VAS评分低(比值比:1.26,P = 0.01)和关节突方向高(比值比:0.95,P = 0.03)是未达到MCID的预测因素,高L4 - 5滑脱百分比(比值比:0.86,P = 0.03)和L5 - S1角运动(比值比:0.78,P = 0.01)是GRC未改善的预测因素,术前ODI评分高(比值比:0.96,P = 0.04)是未达到PASS的预测因素。

结论

高PT和抑郁是恢复缓慢的预测因素,术前腿痛评分低、残疾程度高、关节突方向高、滑脱百分比高以及L5 - S1角运动是未改善的预测因素。然而,这些是初步研究结果,需要进一步对同质队列进行研究以证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Slower Improvement and Nonimprovement After Surgical Treatment of L4-L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Preliminary Results.L4-L5退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗后改善较慢及未改善的临床和影像学预测因素:初步结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Feb 1;50(3):187-195. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005019. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
2
Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression.肌肉健康状况差和术前 ODI 低是微创减压后达到 MCID 较慢的独立预测因素。
Spine J. 2023 Aug;23(8):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.成人退变性腰椎侧凸中单纯微创减压与微创短节段融合的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jun 9;39(3):394-403. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE221047. Print 2023 Sep 1.
5
Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.腰椎融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症患者达到最小临床重要差异的影像学预测因素。
Eur Spine J. 2024 May;33(5):1786-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08051-2. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Pathology: Clinical Outcome Comparison in Patients With Predominant Back Pain.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与侧方腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性脊柱病变:以腰痛为主诉患者的临床疗效比较。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E441-E447. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001631. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
7
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
8
Outcomes of primary versus revision TLIF following decompression alone in degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective propensity score matched study.单纯减压术后原发性与翻修性经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱的疗效:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
Spine J. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.012.
9
Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.微创腰椎减压术后伴退行性腰椎滑脱或脊柱侧弯的腰椎管狭窄症患者的脊柱矢状位平衡的中期变化:至少 5 年随访。
Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
10
Long-Term Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores After Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症行器械辅助腰椎椎间融合术后健康相关生活质量评分的长期最小临床重要差异
World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:e493-e499. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.063. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it Necessary to Fuse? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of One- Versus Two-Level Fusions With Multilevel Decompression.是否有必要进行融合?一项针对单节段与双节段融合联合多节段减压的倾向评分匹配分析。
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 28:21925682251370264. doi: 10.1177/21925682251370264.
2
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.