Pasternak Taschner Natalia, Almeida Paulo
Center for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Instituto Questão de Ciência, São Paulo, Brazil.
Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Apr 11;9(1):bpae023. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae023. eCollection 2024.
While there is worldwide tendency to promote the use of scientific evidence to inform policy making, little has been done to train scientists and policy makers for this interaction. If we want to bridge the gap between academia, scientific knowledge, and policy, we must begin by providing formal training and skill building for actors and stakeholders. Scientists are not trained to communicate and inform policy, and policy makers are not trained to understand scientific process and assess evidence. Building an environment where this collaboration can flourish depends on teaching competencies and abilities specific for decision-making processes. As professors of policy with a background in science, we have started teaching preliminary courses on the use of scientific evidence in policy making. Feedback from students and institutions has been positive, paving the way for similar courses in other schools and institutions and maybe even new career paths. This article is intended to share our experience in designing and teaching courses aimed at training policy makers. Moving forward we plan to include training for science majors, thus encompassing the two main sides of this dialogue and opening new career opportunities for scientists and policy makers.
虽然全球都有推动利用科学证据为政策制定提供信息的趋势,但在培训科学家和政策制定者进行这种互动方面却做得很少。如果我们想弥合学术界、科学知识与政策之间的差距,就必须首先为参与者和利益相关者提供正规培训和技能培养。科学家没有接受过沟通和为政策提供信息的培训,政策制定者也没有接受过理解科学过程和评估证据的培训。营造一个能使这种合作蓬勃发展的环境,取决于教授针对决策过程的特定能力。作为具有科学背景的政策教授,我们已开始教授关于在政策制定中使用科学证据的初级课程。学生和机构的反馈是积极的,为其他学校和机构开设类似课程甚至开辟新的职业道路铺平了道路。本文旨在分享我们在设计和教授旨在培训政策制定者的课程方面的经验。展望未来,我们计划为理科专业学生提供培训,从而涵盖这一对话的两个主要方面,并为科学家和政策制定者创造新的职业机会。