Suppr超能文献

经皮肾造瘘术与输尿管支架置入术治疗梗阻性尿路结石继发肾积水的系统评价与荟萃分析

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stent in hydronephrosis secondary to obstructive urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cardoso Andreia, Coutinho Aparício, Neto Gonçalo, Anacleto Sara, Tinoco Catarina Laranjo, Morais Nuno, Cerqueira-Alves Mário, Lima Estevão, Mota Paulo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):261-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Dec 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess if there is a preferable intervention between retrograde ureteral stent (RUS) and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube, in cases of upper urinary tract stone obstruction with complications requiring urgent drainage, by evaluating outcomes regarding urinary symptoms, quality of life (QoL), spontaneous stone passage, and length of hospital stays, since there is no literature stating the superiority of one modality over the other.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and other sources for relevant articles in June 2019 without any date restrictions or filters applied. The selection was done first by the title and abstract screening and then by full-text assessment for eligibility. Only randomized controlled trials or cohort studies in patients with hydronephrosis secondary to obstructive urolithiasis that presented comparative data between PCN and RUS placement concerning at least one of the defined outcome measures were included. Lastly, MEDLINE database and PubMed platform were screened again using the same terms, from June 2019 until November 2022.

RESULTS

Of 556 initial articles, seven were included in this review. Most works were considered of moderate-to-high quality. Three studies regarding QoL showed a tendency against stenting, even though only one demonstrated statistically significant negative impact on overall health state. Two works reported significantly more post-intervention urinary symptoms in stenting patients. One article found that PCN is a significant predictor of spontaneous stone passage, when adjusted for stone size and location. Findings on length of hospital stays were not consistent among articles.

CONCLUSION

PCN appears to be the intervention better tolerated, with less impact on the patient's perceived QoL and less post-operative urinary symptoms, in comparison with RUS. Nevertheless, further studies with larger samples and a randomized controlled design are suggested.

摘要

目的

评估在上尿路结石梗阻并伴有需要紧急引流的并发症的病例中,逆行输尿管支架置入术(RUS)和经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)管之间是否存在更优的干预措施,通过评估泌尿症状、生活质量(QoL)、结石自然排出情况和住院时间等结果,因为尚无文献表明一种方式优于另一种方式。

方法

我们于2019年6月检索了MEDLINE及其他来源的相关文章,未设置任何日期限制或筛选条件。首先通过标题和摘要筛选进行选择,然后通过全文评估确定是否符合纳入标准。仅纳入了梗阻性尿路结石继发肾积水患者的随机对照试验或队列研究,这些研究提供了PCN和RUS置入术之间至少一项定义的结局指标的比较数据。最后,从2019年6月至2022年11月,使用相同术语再次筛选MEDLINE数据库和PubMed平台。

结果

在556篇初始文章中,有7篇纳入本综述。大多数研究被认为质量中等至高。三项关于生活质量的研究显示出不利于置入支架的趋势,尽管只有一项对总体健康状况有统计学上的显著负面影响。两项研究报告称,置入支架的患者干预后泌尿症状明显更多。一篇文章发现,在调整结石大小和位置后,PCN是结石自然排出的重要预测因素。各文章关于住院时间的研究结果不一致。

结论

与RUS相比,PCN似乎是耐受性更好的干预措施,对患者的生活质量感知影响较小,术后泌尿症状也较少。然而,建议进行更大样本量和随机对照设计的进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验