Kang Mao-Ji, Li Hao-Xin, Gan Yu, Fang Cheng, Yang Xiao-Li, Li Bo, Su Song
Department of General Surgery (Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery), The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e27679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27679. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment, but direct comparisons of different regimens are limited. This study conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of various chemotherapy regimens, with the unique advantage of only including Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
NMA was conducted regarding the searched phase III RCTs by comparing overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) of different chemotherapy protocols.
The analysis included 24 studies with 11470 patients across 25 treatment modalities. Among the chemotherapy regimens evaluated, FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) demonstrated the highest OS and PFS, with a risk ratio (logHR) of 4.5 (95 % confidence interval 4.32-4.68) compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. The PEFG regimen (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine) exhibited the highest ORR, with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.67 (2.08-20) compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. Notably, gemcitabine plus sorafenib was associated with the lowest hematological toxicity, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.1 (0.02-0.48).
Combination therapies may offer greater benefits but also cause more toxic effects. However, combinations with targeted agents seem to have fewer adverse reactions.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种致命疾病,通常在晚期才被诊断出来。全身化疗是主要治疗方法,但不同化疗方案的直接比较有限。本研究进行了一项系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA),以比较各种化疗方案的疗效和安全性,其独特优势在于仅纳入III期随机对照试验(RCT)。
通过比较不同化疗方案的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和不良事件(AE),对检索到的III期RCT进行NMA。
该分析纳入了24项研究,涉及25种治疗方式的11470例患者。在评估的化疗方案中,FOLFIRINOX(氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、伊立替康和奥沙利铂)显示出最高的OS和PFS,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,风险比(logHR)为4.5(95%置信区间4.32 - 4.68)。PEFG方案(顺铂、表柔比星、5-氟尿嘧啶和吉西他滨)显示出最高的ORR,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,优势比(OR)为6.67(2.08 - 20)。值得注意的是,吉西他滨联合索拉非尼的血液学毒性最低,优势比(OR)为0.1(0.02 - 0.48)。
联合治疗可能带来更大益处,但也会产生更多毒性作用。然而,与靶向药物联合似乎不良反应较少。