Suppr超能文献

达托霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物与达托霉素单药治疗革兰氏阳性球菌血流感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of efficacy and safety between daptomycin plus β-lactam and daptomycin monotherapy for bloodstream infections due to gram-positive cocci: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Umemura Takumi, Kato Hideo, Asai Nobuhiro, Hagihara Mao, Hirai Jun, Yamagishi Yuka, Mikamo Hiroshige

机构信息

Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29811. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29811. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical or microbiological outcomes and safety of a combination of daptomycin (DAP) and β-lactams compared to DAP monotherapy in patients with blood stream infection (BSI) due to gram-positive cocci (GPC).

METHODS

We searched Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Ityuushi databases up to January 30, 2023. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical failure, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation.

RESULTS

Six cohorts or case-control studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams significantly reduced the mortality and clinical failure rate for all BSI due to GPC compared with the DAP monotherapy (mortality, odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.98; clinical failure, OR = 0.42, 95 % CI = 0.22-0.81). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of CPK elevation between the two groups (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.39-1.84).

CONCLUSION

Altogether, combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams can improve the prognosis for patients with BSI due to GPC compared with DAP alone. Therefore, it should be considered as an option for the empirical treatment of BSI caused by GPC.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估与达托霉素(DAP)单药治疗相比,DAP与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)所致血流感染(BSI)患者的临床或微生物学结局及安全性。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年1月30日的Scopus、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL和Ityuushi数据库。结局指标包括全因死亡率、临床失败率和肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)升高情况。

结果

六项队列研究或病例对照研究符合纳入标准,并被纳入最终的荟萃分析。与DAP单药治疗相比,DAP与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗显著降低了所有GPC所致BSI的死亡率和临床失败率(死亡率,比值比[OR]=0.63,95%置信区间[CI]=0.41-0.98;临床失败率,OR=0.42,95%CI=0.22-0.81)。相比之下,两组间CPK升高的发生率无显著差异(OR=0.85,95%CI=0.39-1.84)。

结论

总体而言,与单独使用DAP相比,DAP与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗可改善GPC所致BSI患者的预后。因此,应将其视为GPC所致BSI经验性治疗的一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de41/11046193/b3ac324d7d49/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验