Umemura Takumi, Kato Hideo, Mutoh Yoshikazu, Hagihara Mao, Ikeda Yoshiaki, Mikamo Hiroshige
Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Tosei General Hospital, Seto, Aichi, Japan.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11153-5.
We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether remdesivir (RDV) is safe for patients with severe renal impairment (SRI) and COVID-19, compared to non-SRI patients or those not receiving RDV.
This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We searched PubMed, Cohcrane, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases up to October 11, 2024. The outcomes assessed kidney injury, hepatic disorder and mortality. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective and cohort studies reporting kidney injury, hepatotoxicity, and mortality in (i) SRI patients treated with RDV versus without RDV or (ii) SRI patients versus non-SRI patients treated with RDV were included. Targeted patients were defined as adults with COVID-19 based on a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal or salivary swabs regardless of symptoms.
One randomized controlled trial and 14 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Among SRI patients, RDV significantly reduced the incidence of kidney injury (risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27-0.97) but had no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.98) and mortality (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55-1.15). In the comparison between SRI and non-SRI patients treated with RDV, SRI patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of kidney injury (odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.49-4.23), with no significant difference in the development of hepatic disorder (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.43-2.53). Meanwhile, SRI patients treated with RDV exhibited significantly higher mortality than non-SRI patients treated with RDV (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.51-3.22).
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that RDV administration in SRI patients with COVID-19 was safe compared to non-SRI or SRI patient treated without RDV. We suggest that the use of RDV should be actively considered for SRI patients.
我们进行了一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估与非严重肾功能损害(SRI)患者或未接受瑞德西韦(RDV)治疗的患者相比,RDV对患有严重肾功能损害和新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的患者是否安全。
本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的PRISMA指南进行。我们检索了截至2024年10月11日的PubMed、Cohcrane、CINAHL和Ichushi数据库。评估的结局包括肾损伤、肝脏疾病和死亡率。纳入报告了以下情况的随机对照试验以及回顾性和队列研究:(i)接受RDV治疗与未接受RDV治疗的SRI患者的肾损伤、肝毒性和死亡率;(ii)接受RDV治疗的SRI患者与非SRI患者的肾损伤、肝毒性和死亡率。目标患者定义为基于鼻咽或唾液拭子的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性或快速抗原检测确诊为COVID-19的成年人,无论有无症状。
一项随机对照试验和14项队列研究符合纳入标准并被纳入最终的荟萃分析。在SRI患者中,RDV显著降低了肾损伤的发生率(风险比[RR]=0.51,95%置信区间[CI]=0.27-0.97),但在肝脏疾病发生方面无显著差异(RR=0.88,95%CI=0.39-1.98),在死亡率方面也无显著差异(RR=0.79,95%CI=0.55-1.15)。在接受RDV治疗的SRI患者与非SRI患者的比较中,SRI患者的肾损伤发生率显著更高(优势比[OR]=2.51,95%CI=1.49-4.23),在肝脏疾病发生方面无显著差异(OR=1.04,95%CI=0.43-2.53)。同时,接受RDV治疗的SRI患者的死亡率显著高于接受RDV治疗的非SRI患者(OR=2.20,95%CI=1.51-3.22)。
我们的荟萃分析表明,与非SRI患者或未接受RDV治疗的SRI患者相比,在患有COVID-19的SRI患者中使用RDV是安全的。我们建议应积极考虑对SRI患者使用RDV。