• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导穿刺(与计算机断层扫描引导相比)在颈源性疼痛的颈椎内侧支阻滞中的准确性和疗效:一项随机对照研究。

Accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided puncture (vs. computed tomography-guided) in cervical medial branch blocks for cervicogenic pain: A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Tian Jie, Li Xin-Yan, Yin Yan, Zhao Nan, Xiao Hong, Liu Hui

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China.

Department of Anesthesiology Southwest Medical University Luzhou Sichuan China.

出版信息

Ibrain. 2024 Mar 17;10(1):34-45. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12151. eCollection 2024 Spring.

DOI:10.1002/ibra.12151
PMID:38682018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11045187/
Abstract

Cervical medial branch block (CMBB) has been recognized as an effective treatment for cervicogenic pain. Previous studies mostly used ultrasound-guided out-of-plane puncture for CMBB, while this prospective study was designed to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided in-plane puncture, specifically focusing on the new target of CMBB for cervical pain. This study includes two parts: the accuracy study ( = 15, CMBB was completed by ultrasound and confirmed by computed tomography [CT], in which a good distribution percentage of the analgesic solution was observed) and the efficacy study ( = 40, CMBB was completed by ultrasound or CT, while the proportion of pain relief (numerical rating scale) decrease by more than 50% postoperatively was analyzed). The results showed that the good distribution percentage of the analgesic solution was 97.8%. Furthermore, in the early period (30 min and 2 h postoperatively), the proportion of patients with pain relief was lower in the ultrasound group than that in the CT group, especially at 2 h postoperatively (52% vs. 94%). However, at 24 h postoperatively and later, the proportion of patients with pain relief gradually stabilized to about 60%-70%, and lasted for about 2 weeks to 1 month. Therefore, the new target for CMBB, guided by ultrasound in-plane, offers high visibility and accuracy. A single CMBB performed under ultrasound guidance resulted in pain relief comparable to that of a CT-guided procedure (1 day to 1 month postoperatively). This study indicated that CMBB guided by ultrasound in-plane could be regarded as a promising approach for treatment of cervicogenic pain.

摘要

颈椎内侧支阻滞(CMBB)已被公认为是治疗颈源性疼痛的一种有效方法。以往的研究大多采用超声引导下的平面外穿刺进行CMBB,而本前瞻性研究旨在探讨超声引导下平面内穿刺的疗效,特别关注CMBB治疗颈部疼痛的新靶点。本研究包括两个部分:准确性研究(n = 15,通过超声完成CMBB并经计算机断层扫描[CT]证实,观察到镇痛溶液的良好分布百分比)和疗效研究(n = 40,通过超声或CT完成CMBB,同时分析术后疼痛缓解(数字评分量表)下降超过50%的比例)。结果显示,镇痛溶液的良好分布百分比为97.8%。此外,在早期(术后30分钟和2小时),超声组疼痛缓解患者的比例低于CT组,尤其是在术后2小时(52%对94%)。然而,在术后24小时及以后,疼痛缓解患者的比例逐渐稳定在约60%-70%,并持续约2周至1个月。因此,超声平面内引导下的CMBB新靶点具有高可视性和准确性。在超声引导下进行单次CMBB所产生的疼痛缓解效果与CT引导下的操作相当(术后1天至1个月)。本研究表明,超声平面内引导下的CMBB可被视为治疗颈源性疼痛的一种有前景的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/a28f2a80294e/IBRA-10-34-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/cdda411cac93/IBRA-10-34-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/37060982c069/IBRA-10-34-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/e5e0a267ef64/IBRA-10-34-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/4f5520dfa7c1/IBRA-10-34-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/a28f2a80294e/IBRA-10-34-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/cdda411cac93/IBRA-10-34-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/37060982c069/IBRA-10-34-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/e5e0a267ef64/IBRA-10-34-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/4f5520dfa7c1/IBRA-10-34-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/611e/11045187/a28f2a80294e/IBRA-10-34-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided puncture (vs. computed tomography-guided) in cervical medial branch blocks for cervicogenic pain: A randomized controlled study.超声引导穿刺(与计算机断层扫描引导相比)在颈源性疼痛的颈椎内侧支阻滞中的准确性和疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Ibrain. 2024 Mar 17;10(1):34-45. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12151. eCollection 2024 Spring.
2
A Comparison of Precision and Safety using Three Recognized Ultrasound-Guided Approaches to Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: A Cadaver Study.三种公认的超声引导下颈椎内侧支阻滞方法的精度和安全性比较:尸体研究。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):E157-E168.
3
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block for the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain: a retrospective comparative study.超声与透视引导下颈椎内侧支阻滞治疗慢性颈椎小关节疼痛:一项回顾性对照研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Jan;46(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2516-2. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
4
A Novel Ultrasound-Guided "Three in One" Approach Plus Interfascial Plane Blocks for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache.一种新型超声引导下“三合一”方法联合筋膜间平面阻滞治疗颈源性头痛
Local Reg Anesth. 2024 Feb 1;17:1-8. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S446667. eCollection 2024.
5
Randomized Comparative Study Between Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Under Ultrasound Guidance for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.超声引导下双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞用于全腹子宫切除术后镇痛的随机对照研究
Cureus. 2022 May 22;14(5):e25227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25227. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique.使用平面内技术对超声引导下颈椎内侧支阻滞安全性的前瞻性评估。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 5;50(3):237-242. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105296.
7
A randomized comparison between ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided c7 medial branch block.超声与透视引导下 C7 脊神经后内侧支阻滞的随机比较
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):52-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000186.
8
Comparative Outcome of Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine for Cervical Medial Branch Block in Chronic Cervical Facet Arthropathy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.利多卡因与布比卡因用于慢性颈脊神经后支关节病颈椎内侧支阻滞的疗效比较:一项随机双盲研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e662-e668. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
9
Effects of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block on the postoperative analgesia after open liver surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.超声引导下外侧肋间平面阻滞对开腹肝手术后镇痛效果的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 16;25(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08449-3.
10
Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于腹腔镜肾切除术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照非劣效性临床试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jun;89(6):520-528. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16794-5. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
mHealth Intervention for Improving Pain, Quality of Life, and Functional Disability in Patients With Chronic Pain: Systematic Review.移动医疗干预对改善慢性疼痛患者疼痛、生活质量和功能障碍的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Feb 2;11:e40844. doi: 10.2196/40844.
2
A randomized controlled trial on the effects of "Global Postural Re-education" versus neck specific exercise on pain, disability, postural control, and neuromuscular features in women with chronic non-specific neck pain.一项关于“整体姿势再教育”与颈部特定运动对慢性非特异性颈痛女性疼痛、残疾、姿势控制和神经肌肉特征影响的随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;59(1):42-53. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07554-2. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors.
颈部疼痛:全球流行病学、趋势和风险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4.
4
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.多学科国际工作组关于颈椎(关节突)关节疼痛干预措施的共识实践指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jan;47(1):3-59. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.美国成年人慢性疼痛的患病率。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
6
Risk factors for non-specific neck pain in young adults. A systematic review.年轻人非特异性颈痛的危险因素。系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03379-y.
7
Discomfort glare and psychological stress during computer work: subjective responses and associations between neck pain and trapezius muscle blood flow.在计算机工作中,不适眩光和心理压力:颈部疼痛与斜方肌血流之间的主观反应和关联。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Jan;93(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01457-w. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain.颈部疼痛的诊断和治疗进展。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 14;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221.
9
Ultrasound-Guided C7 Cervical Medial Branch Block Using the In-Plane Approach.超声引导下采用平面内入路的C7颈椎内侧支阻滞
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;96(9):e164. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000696.
10
A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis of the Effectiveness of Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in Managing Chronic Spinal Pain.治疗性小关节干预在慢性脊柱疼痛管理中有效性的系统评价与最佳证据综合分析
Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):E535-82.