Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalya, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Aug;34(8):750-757. doi: 10.1111/pan.14911. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Pediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C-MAC D-blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope.
After Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack-Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes.
Both groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C-MAC (0 [0-0] vs. 0 [0-2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5-7] vs. 8.0 s [6-10], p = .006) was lesser in the C-MAC D-blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16-22] vs. 18 s [15-22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications.
The C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C-MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D-blade.
儿科气道管理需要仔细的临床评估和经验丰富的操作,这是由于解剖学、生理学和发育方面的考虑。视频喉镜在儿科气道中是一个不断发展的研究领域,最近的数据表明视频喉镜优于标准的 Macintosh 叶片。具体来说,关于 C-MAC D 叶片与 McCoy 直接喉镜相比的优势的文献很少。
在伦理委员会批准后,招募了 70 名美国麻醉师协会身体状况 1 和 2 级、年龄在 4-12 岁的择期全身麻醉下手术的儿童。患者随机分配使用 C-MAC 视频喉镜 2 号 D 叶片(组 1)和 McCoy 喉镜 2 号叶片(组 2)进行插管。插管难度量表(IDS)作为插管容易程度的主要结果,而 Cormack-Lehane 分级、喉镜和插管时间、血流动力学反应以及任何气道并发症的发生率则为次要结果。
两组患者的特征相似。C-MAC(0 [0-0] 与 0 [0-2],p=0.055)的中位(IQR)插管难度量表(IDS)评分更好,但无统计学意义。C-MAC D 叶片组的声门视图更好(32/35 为 CL 分级 I,23/35 为 CL 分级 I,p=0.002),最佳声门视图的时间更短(6 s [5-7] 与 8.0 s [6-10],p=0.006),而插管总时间相当(20 s [16-22] 与 18 s [15-22],p=0.374)。所有患者均能首次成功插管。无一例患者发生任何并发症。
在儿童中,C-MAC 视频喉镜 2 号 D 叶片与 McCoy 2 号喉镜相比,提供了更快、更好的声门可视化效果,但插管难度相似。与 McCoy 喉镜相比,C-MAC 实现声门视野的时间缩短,但并未转化为插管总时间缩短,这归因于 D 叶片的明显弯曲度。