Suppr超能文献

在教育基础上增加运动控制或强化训练,对于肩袖相关的肩部疼痛是否能带来更好的治疗效果?一项多组随机对照试验。

Does the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises to education result in better outcomes for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain? A multiarm randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Dubé Marc-Olivier, Desmeules François, Lewis Jeremy S, Roy Jean-Sébastien

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;57(8):457-463. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105027. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term, mid-term and long-term effects between three interventions (education only, education and strengthening exercises, education and motor control exercises) for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) on symptoms and function.

METHODS

123 adults presenting with RCRSP took part in a 12-week intervention. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 intervention groups. Symptoms and function were evaluated at baseline and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) (primary outcome) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). Linear mixed modelling was used to compare the effects of the three programmes on the outcomes.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks, between-group differences were -2.1 (-7.7 to 3.5) (motor control vs education), 1.2 (-4.9 to 7.4) (strengthening vs education) and -3.3 (-9.5 to 2.8) (motor control vs strengthening) for the DASH and 9.3 (1.5 to 17.1) (motor control vs education), 1.3 (-7.6 to 10.2) (strengthening vs education) and 8.0 (-0.5 to 16.5) (motor control vs strengthening) for the WORC. There was a significant group-by-time interaction (p=0.04) with DASH, but follow-up analyses did not reveal any clinically meaningful between-group differences. There was no significant group-by-time interaction (p=0.39) for the WORC. Between-group differences never exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of DASH or WORC.

CONCLUSION

In people with RCRSP, the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises to education did not lead to larger improvements in symptoms and function compared with education alone. Further research should investigate the value of providing stepped care by identifying individuals who may only need education and those who would benefit from the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03892603.

摘要

目的

比较三种干预措施(仅教育、教育与强化训练、教育与运动控制训练)对肩袖相关肩部疼痛(RCRSP)的短期、中期和长期影响,包括症状和功能方面。

方法

123名患有RCRSP的成年人参加了为期12周的干预。他们被随机分配到3个干预组中的一组。使用手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH)(主要结局指标)和西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)在基线、3周、6周、12周和24周时评估症状和功能。采用线性混合模型比较这三种方案对结局的影响。

结果

24周后,DASH方面,运动控制组与教育组的组间差异为-2.1(-7.7至3.5),强化训练组与教育组为1.2(-4.9至7.4),运动控制组与强化训练组为-3.3(-9.5至2.8);WORC方面,运动控制组与教育组为9.3(1.5至17.1),强化训练组与教育组为1.3(-(7.6至10.2),运动控制组与强化训练组为8.0(-0.5至16.5)。DASH存在显著的组×时间交互作用(p = 0.04),但随访分析未发现任何具有临床意义的组间差异。WORC不存在显著的组×时间交互作用(p = 0.39)。组间差异从未超过DASH或WORC的最小临床重要差异。

结论

在患有RCRSP的人群中,与单纯教育相比,在教育基础上增加运动控制训练或强化训练并未导致症状和功能有更大改善。进一步的研究应通过识别可能仅需要教育的个体以及那些将从增加运动控制训练或强化训练中受益的个体来研究提供分级护理的价值。

试验注册号

NCT03892603。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验