Suppr超能文献

不同镇痛策略联合常规物理治疗方案治疗慢性肩痛的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of different analgesic strategies combined with conventional physiotherapy program for treating chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Medicine College, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05037-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of five analgesic strategies combined with conventional physiotherapy program (CPT) in managing chronic shoulder pain.

METHODS

Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data using a pre-formatted chart, and assessed bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A network meta-analysis was performed by the Stata 17.0 and R 4.3.2 software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 862 subjects were identified. These analgesic strategies included extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), corticosteroid injection (CSI), hyaluronic acid injection (HAI), and kinesio taping (KT). ESWT plus CPT was the most efficient intervention in alleviating pain intensity and improving physical function. SSNB plus CPT was the optimal intervention in improving shoulder mobility. Compared to CPT alone, CSI + CPT only significantly improved the SPADI total score, but showed no difference in pain intensity or shoulder mobility. HAI + CPT showed no significant difference in improving pain intensity, physical function, or shoulder mobility compared to CPT alone. Adding KT to CPT did not yield additional benefits in improving shoulder mobility.

CONCLUSION

Overall, in managing chronic shoulder pain, ESWT + CPT was the most effective intervention for reducing pain intensity and improving physical function. SSNB + CPT was optimal for enhancing shoulder mobility. Future rigorous clinical trials with larger sample sizes and higher methodological rigor are strongly required to confirm the current results.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨五种镇痛策略联合常规物理治疗方案(CPT)治疗慢性肩痛的疗效。

方法

两位作者独立筛选研究,使用预先格式化的图表提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。采用 Stata 17.0 和 R 4.3.2 软件进行网络荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 14 项研究,共 862 例受试者。这些镇痛策略包括体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)、皮质类固醇注射(CSI)、透明质酸注射(HAI)和肌内贴扎(KT)。ESWT 联合 CPT 是缓解疼痛强度和改善身体功能最有效的干预措施。SSNB 联合 CPT 是改善肩部活动度的最佳干预措施。与 CPT 单独治疗相比,CSI+CPT 仅显著改善了 SPADI 总评分,但在疼痛强度或肩部活动度方面没有差异。与 CPT 单独治疗相比,HAI+CPT 对改善疼痛强度、身体功能或肩部活动度没有显著差异。CPT 联合 KT 并不能改善肩部活动度。

结论

总体而言,在治疗慢性肩痛方面,ESWT+CPT 是减轻疼痛强度和改善身体功能最有效的干预措施。SSNB+CPT 是增强肩部活动度的最佳选择。需要未来进行更严格的临床试验,样本量更大,方法学更严谨,以证实目前的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4653/11378570/4275cadf3814/13018_2024_5037_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验