Suppr超能文献

基于改进的人为差错风险量化方法的飞行安全评估。

Flight safety assessment based on a modified human error risk quantification approach.

机构信息

School of Aeronautical Engineering, Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology, Nanjing, China.

Aeronautic Intelligent Manufacturing and Digital Health Management Technology Engineering Research Center, Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 29;19(4):e0302511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302511. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In risk and safety assessments of aviation systems, engineers generally pay more attention to the risks of hardware or software failure and focus less on the risks caused by human errors. In this paper, a (FRAHE) method is proposed for identifying this critical error type and determining the risk severity of human errors. This method accounts for the human error probability as well as the impacts of human errors on the system. The fuzzy inference approach is employed in this paper to address the uncertainty and issues of imprecision that arise from insufficient information and scarce error data and a risk assessment model of human error is developed. The model can be used to precisely describe the relationship between the output risk severity and the input risk indicators, including the human error probability, the error impact probability, and the human error consequence. A case study of the approach task is presented to demonstrate the availability and reasonability of the model. The risk-based modeling method can not only provide valuable information for reducing the occurrence of critical errors but also be used to conduct prospective analyses to prevent unsafe incidents or aviation accidents.

摘要

在航空系统的风险和安全评估中,工程师通常更关注硬件或软件故障的风险,而较少关注人为错误所导致的风险。本文提出了一种(FRAHE)方法,用于识别这种关键错误类型,并确定人为错误的风险严重程度。该方法考虑了人为错误的概率以及人为错误对系统的影响。本文采用模糊推理方法来处理由于信息不足和错误数据稀缺而导致的不确定性和不精确性问题,并开发了一种人为错误风险评估模型。该模型可用于精确描述输出风险严重程度与输入风险指标之间的关系,包括人为错误概率、错误影响概率和人为错误后果。通过一个方法任务的案例研究,验证了该模型的有效性和合理性。基于风险的建模方法不仅可以为减少关键错误的发生提供有价值的信息,还可以用于进行前瞻性分析,以防止不安全事件或航空事故的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/569b/11057747/dace5f820568/pone.0302511.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Flight safety assessment based on a modified human error risk quantification approach.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 29;19(4):e0302511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302511. eCollection 2024.
2
Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231391. eCollection 2020.
3
An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017.
J Safety Res. 2019 Jun;69:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Fatigue proofing: The role of protective behaviours in mediating fatigue-related risk in a defence aviation environment.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt B):465-468. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Impact of gender, age and experience of pilots on general aviation accidents.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):962-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.023. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
8
Structured methods for identifying and correcting potential human errors in space operations.
Acta Astronaut. 1998 Aug-Sep;43(3-6):211-22. doi: 10.1016/s0094-5765(98)00155-6.
9
Exploring human error in military aviation flight safety events using post-incident classification systems.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2013 Aug;84(8):803-13. doi: 10.3357/asem.3176.2013.
10
Improving Aviation Safety through Modeling Accident Risk Assessment of Runway.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6085. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176085.

本文引用的文献

1
Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231391. eCollection 2020.
2
Latent human error analysis and efficient improvement strategies by fuzzy TOPSIS in aviation maintenance tasks.
Appl Ergon. 2016 May;54:136-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 2: Detailed comparison of techniques.
Appl Ergon. 1992 Dec;23(6):371-81. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90368-6.
6
Task analysis for industrial work process from aspects of human reliability and system safety.
Risk Anal. 1999 Jun;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1007044527558.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验