Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 15;30(14):2986-2995. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2819.
We aimed to describe RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers as they relate to clinicopathologic and genomic features, survival, and therapeutic implications.
Gynecologic cancers with available somatic molecular profiling data at our institution between February 2010 and August 2022 were included and grouped by RAS mutation status. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.
Of 3,328 gynecologic cancers, 523 (15.7%) showed any RAS mutation. Patients with RAS-mutated tumors were younger (57 vs. 60 years nonmutated), had a higher prevalence of endometriosis (27.3% vs. 16.9%), and lower grades (grade 1/2, 43.2% vs. 8.1%, all P < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of KRAS mutation was in mesonephric-like endometrial (100%, n = 9/9), mesonephric-like ovarian (83.3%, n = 5/6), mucinous ovarian (60.4%), and low-grade serous ovarian (44.4%) cancers. After adjustment for age, cancer type, and grade, RAS mutation was associated with worse overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3; P = 0.001]. Specific mutations were in KRAS (13.5%), NRAS (2.0%), and HRAS (0.51%), most commonly KRAS G12D (28.4%) and G12V (26.1%). Common co-mutations were PIK3CA (30.9%), PTEN (28.8%), ARID1A (28.0%), and TP53 (27.9%), of which 64.7% were actionable. RAS + MAPK pathway-targeted therapies were administered to 62 patients with RAS-mutated cancers. While overall survival was significantly higher with therapy [8.4 years [(95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-12.0) vs. 5.5 years (95% CI, 4.6-6.6); HR = 0.67; P = 0.031], this effect did not persist in multivariable analysis.
RAS mutations in gynecologic cancers have a distinct histopathologic distribution and may impact overall survival. PIK3CA, PTEN, and ARID1A are potentially actionable co-alterations. RAS pathway-targeted therapy should be considered.
本研究旨在描述妇科癌症中的 RAS 突变与临床病理和基因组特征、生存及治疗意义的关系。
回顾性分析 2010 年 2 月至 2022 年 8 月在我院进行的具有可用体细胞分子谱分析数据的妇科癌症患者,按 RAS 突变状态进行分组。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总生存率,采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行多变量分析。
在 3328 例妇科癌症中,523 例(15.7%)存在任何 RAS 突变。与未突变肿瘤患者相比,RAS 突变肿瘤患者更年轻(57 岁比 60 岁),子宫内膜异位症患病率更高(27.3%比 16.9%),肿瘤分级更低(1/2 级 43.2%比 8.1%,均 P<0.0001)。在苗勒管样子宫内膜癌(100%,9/9)、苗勒管样卵巢癌(83.3%,5/6)、黏液性卵巢癌(60.4%)和低级别浆液性卵巢癌(44.4%)中,KRAS 突变的发生率最高。校正年龄、癌症类型和分级后,RAS 突变与总生存率降低相关[风险比(HR)=1.3;P=0.001]。特定的突变发生在 KRAS(13.5%)、NRAS(2.0%)和 HRAS(0.51%),最常见的是 KRAS G12D(28.4%)和 G12V(26.1%)。常见的共突变是 PIK3CA(30.9%)、PTEN(28.8%)、ARID1A(28.0%)和 TP53(27.9%),其中 64.7%是可操作的。62 例 RAS 突变癌症患者接受了 RAS+MAPK 通路靶向治疗。尽管接受治疗的患者总生存率显著提高[8.4 年(95%置信区间(CI),5.5-12.0)比 5.5 年(95% CI,4.6-6.6);HR=0.67;P=0.031],但多变量分析并未证实这一结果。
妇科癌症中的 RAS 突变具有独特的组织病理学分布,可能影响总生存率。PIK3CA、PTEN 和 ARID1A 是潜在的可操作的共改变。应考虑 RAS 通路靶向治疗。