Suppr超能文献

三种基于试剂盒的平台用于呼吸道病毒综合征检测的比较。

Comparison of three cartridge-based platforms for syndromic testing for respiratory viruses.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul;109(3):116308. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116308. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Abstract

Syndromic testing, the simultaneous testing for multiple pathogens causing similar symptoms, has recently gained ground in clinical diagnostics. This approach can significantly shorten time to diagnosis and speed up decision-making, leading to an improved outcome for the patient. Here, we compared three automated multiplex PCR platforms for syndromic testing of respiratory samples in a retrospective study, and assessed their relative sensitivities. The PPA between BioFire and QIAstat compared to ePlex was 98.4 % and 93.8 %, respectively, and 6 discrepant results were observed. The BioFire was identified as the platform with the highest relative sensitivity. Overall, the platforms performed similarly and are all suitable for syndromic testing of respiratory samples.

摘要

症状检测,即同时针对引起相似症状的多种病原体进行检测,最近在临床诊断中得到了广泛应用。这种方法可以显著缩短诊断时间,加快决策过程,从而改善患者的预后。在这里,我们在一项回顾性研究中比较了三种用于呼吸道样本症状检测的自动化多重 PCR 平台,并评估了它们的相对灵敏度。与 ePlex 相比,BioFire 与 QIAstat 之间的 PPA 分别为 98.4%和 93.8%,观察到 6 个不一致的结果。BioFire 被确定为具有最高相对灵敏度的平台。总的来说,这些平台的性能相似,均适用于呼吸道样本的症状检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验