Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul;109(3):116308. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116308. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
Syndromic testing, the simultaneous testing for multiple pathogens causing similar symptoms, has recently gained ground in clinical diagnostics. This approach can significantly shorten time to diagnosis and speed up decision-making, leading to an improved outcome for the patient. Here, we compared three automated multiplex PCR platforms for syndromic testing of respiratory samples in a retrospective study, and assessed their relative sensitivities. The PPA between BioFire and QIAstat compared to ePlex was 98.4 % and 93.8 %, respectively, and 6 discrepant results were observed. The BioFire was identified as the platform with the highest relative sensitivity. Overall, the platforms performed similarly and are all suitable for syndromic testing of respiratory samples.
症状检测,即同时针对引起相似症状的多种病原体进行检测,最近在临床诊断中得到了广泛应用。这种方法可以显著缩短诊断时间,加快决策过程,从而改善患者的预后。在这里,我们在一项回顾性研究中比较了三种用于呼吸道样本症状检测的自动化多重 PCR 平台,并评估了它们的相对灵敏度。与 ePlex 相比,BioFire 与 QIAstat 之间的 PPA 分别为 98.4%和 93.8%,观察到 6 个不一致的结果。BioFire 被确定为具有最高相对灵敏度的平台。总的来说,这些平台的性能相似,均适用于呼吸道样本的症状检测。