Suppr超能文献

比较Luminex NxTAG呼吸道病原体检测板和RespiFinder-22对呼吸道病原体的多重检测。

Comparing Luminex NxTAG-Respiratory Pathogen Panel and RespiFinder-22 for multiplex detection of respiratory pathogens.

作者信息

Beckmann Christiane, Hirsch Hans H

机构信息

Division of Infection Diagnostics, Department of Biomedicine (Haus Petersplatz), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine (Haus Petersplatz), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2016 Aug;88(8):1319-24. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24492. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Abstract

Respiratory tract infection (RTI) involves a variety of viruses and bacteria, which can be conveniently detected by multiplex nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT). To compare the novel Luminex-based NxTAG-Respiratory Pathogen Panel (NxTAG-RPP) with the routine multiplex-ligation-NAT based RespiFinder-22® (RF-22), 282 respiratory specimens including nasopharyngeal swabs (71%), broncho-alveolar lavage (27%), throat swabs, tracheal secretions, and sputum (2%) from 116 children and 155 adults were extracted using a Corbett CAS1200 (Qiagen), and analyzed in parallel by the routine RF-22 and NxTAG-RPP. Concordant results were obtained in 263 (93.3%) cases consisting of concordant positives in 167 (59.2%) and concordant negatives in 96 (34%). Results were discordant in 19 (6.7%) consisting of 15 positive:negative, and 4 negative:positive results by NxTAG-RPP versus RF-22, respectively. Co-infections were observed in 10.3% with NxTAG-RPP and in 5.9% with RF-22. Most additional viral pathogens identified by the NxTAG-RPP involved dual infections with rhinovirus and RSV. Discordant samples were mainly due to low genome signals of Ct less than 36, when retested by QNAT suggesting a higher sensitivity of the NxTAG-RPP, also when detecting multiple infections. Hands-on time after extraction for 24 and 96 samples was 0.25 and <0.5 hr for the NxTAG-RPP, and 2 and 4 hr for the RF-22, respectively. The median turn-around time was 6 hr (range 5-7 hr) for NxTAG-RPP and 12 hr (range 8-16 hr) for RF-22. The NxTAG-RPP showed comparable detection rates for most respiratory pathogens, while hands-on and turn-around time were considerably shorter. The clinical significance of detecting multiple viruses needs further clinical evaluation. J. Med. Virol. 88:1319-1324, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

呼吸道感染(RTI)涉及多种病毒和细菌,通过多重核酸扩增检测(NAT)能够方便地检测出来。为了将基于新型Luminex的NxTAG-呼吸道病原体检测板(NxTAG-RPP)与基于常规多重连接NAT的RespiFinder-22®(RF-22)进行比较,使用Corbett CAS1200(Qiagen)提取了来自116名儿童和155名成人的282份呼吸道标本,包括鼻咽拭子(71%)、支气管肺泡灌洗样本(27%)、咽拭子、气管分泌物和痰液(2%),并同时采用常规的RF-22和NxTAG-RPP进行分析。在263例(93.3%)病例中获得了一致结果,其中167例(59.2%)为一致阳性,96例(34%)为一致阴性。19例(6.7%)结果不一致,NxTAG-RPP与RF-22相比,分别有15例阳性:阴性和4例阴性:阳性结果。NxTAG-RPP检测到的合并感染率为10.3%,RF-22为5.9%。NxTAG-RPP鉴定出的大多数额外病毒病原体涉及鼻病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的双重感染。不一致的样本主要是由于Ct值小于36的基因组信号较低,经定量核酸扩增检测(QNAT)重新检测表明NxTAG-RPP具有更高的灵敏度,在检测多重感染时也是如此。对于24份和96份样本,NxTAG-RPP提取后的实际操作时间分别为0.25小时和小于0.5小时,RF-22分别为2小时和4小时。NxTAG-RPP的中位周转时间为6小时(范围5 - 7小时),RF-22为12小时(范围8 - 16小时)。NxTAG-RPP对大多数呼吸道病原体的检测率相当,而实际操作时间和周转时间则短得多。检测多种病毒的临床意义需要进一步的临床评估。《医学病毒学杂志》88:1319 - 1324,2016年。©2016威利期刊公司

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of near-patient testing for influenza.流感即时检测的诊断性能
J Clin Virol. 2015 Jun;67:43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Viral pneumonia.病毒性肺炎。
Lancet. 2011 Apr 9;377(9773):1264-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61459-6. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验