• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神变态对主动和旁观者网络欺凌行为的差异影响:黑暗人格四因素特质和较低宜人性的作用。

The differential effect of psychopathy on active and bystander trolling behaviors: the role of dark tetrad traits and lower agreeableness.

机构信息

Human Factors and Applied Cognition Lab, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, 453552, India.

Discipline of Psychology, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, 453552, India.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60203-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-60203-6
PMID:38688968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061140/
Abstract

This study aimed to develop the Global Assessment of Active Trolling and Passive Bystanderism (GAATPB) scale and investigate the influence of personality traits on trolling behaviors. Focusing on the Dark Tetrad (DT) traits and agreeableness, the present study examined their associations and predictive utility on active trolling and passive bystanderism. Participants were recruited from social networking sites (SNSs), and eligibility criteria included active SNS usage and engagement in online interactions. A total of 797 healthy adult students participated in the study, with data from 300 used for the initial exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the remaining 497 (M = 22.25 years, SD = 3.37) for the subsequent analyses. Results indicated a significant correlation between DT traits and agreeableness across both active trolling and passive bystanderism, revealing a shared personality profile. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that narcissism, Machiavellianism, and trait sadism were predictors of active trolling, with psychopathy being the strongest predictor. However, psychopathy did not emerge as a predictor for passive bystanderism. The study also highlighted that DT traits mediated the relationship between lower agreeableness and overall trolling behavior, suggesting that trolling manifests from lower agreeableness through the instigation of callous-unemotional, manipulative, and self-centered traits inherent in DT.

摘要

本研究旨在开发全球主动网络骚扰和被动旁观者行为评估量表(GAATPB),并探讨人格特质对网络骚扰行为的影响。本研究聚焦于黑暗人格四因素(DT)特质和宜人性,检验了它们与主动网络骚扰和被动旁观者行为的关联及其预测作用。研究参与者来自社交网站(SNS),入选标准包括积极使用 SNS 和参与在线互动。共有 797 名健康成年学生参与了研究,其中 300 名学生的数据用于初始探索性因素分析(EFA),其余 497 名学生(M = 22.25 岁,SD = 3.37)用于后续分析。结果表明,在主动网络骚扰和被动旁观者行为中,DT 特质和宜人性之间存在显著相关,揭示了一种共同的人格特征。分层多元回归分析表明,自恋、马基雅维利主义和特质性虐待倾向是主动网络骚扰的预测因素,而精神病态是最强的预测因素。然而,精神病态并不是被动旁观者行为的预测因素。研究还强调,DT 特质在宜人性较低与整体网络骚扰行为之间起中介作用,表明通过易冷酷无情、操纵和以自我为中心的 DT 特质的激发,宜人性较低会导致网络骚扰行为的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/1e5065faeb02/41598_2024_60203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/8b7ecd14f848/41598_2024_60203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/fa510e225b75/41598_2024_60203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/1e5065faeb02/41598_2024_60203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/8b7ecd14f848/41598_2024_60203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/fa510e225b75/41598_2024_60203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d3/11061140/1e5065faeb02/41598_2024_60203_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The differential effect of psychopathy on active and bystander trolling behaviors: the role of dark tetrad traits and lower agreeableness.精神变态对主动和旁观者网络欺凌行为的差异影响:黑暗人格四因素特质和较低宜人性的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60203-6.
2
Haters Gonna Hate, Trolls Gonna Troll: The Personality Profile of a Facebook Troll.恨者自会恨,喷子自会喷:脸书喷子的性格剖析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115722.
3
Troll story: The dark tetrad and online trolling revisited with a glance at humor.恶搞故事:再看一次黑暗人格四因素与网络恶搞。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 10;18(3):e0280271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280271. eCollection 2023.
4
Online Disinhibition and Online Trolling Among Chinese College Students: The Mediation of the Dark Triad and the Moderation of Gender.网络去抑制与网络喷子行为在我国大学生群体中的表现:黑暗人格三因素的中介作用及性别的调节作用
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Nov;25(11):744-751. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0046. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment.网络喷子行为和日常施虐癖:对疼痛感知和道德判断的平行影响。
J Pers. 2019 Apr;87(2):328-340. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12393. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
6
The Dark Tetrad: analysis of profiles and relationship with the Big Five personality factors.黑暗人格四因素:人格特质分析与大五人格因素的关系
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55074-w.
7
Dark Personality Traits and Online Behaviors: Portuguese Versions of Cyberstalking, Online Harassment, Flaming and Trolling Scales.阴暗人格特质与网络行为:网络跟踪、网络骚扰、网络谩骂和网络诱骗行为的葡萄牙语版本量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;20(12):6136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126136.
8
The dark side of internet: Preliminary evidence for the associations of dark personality traits with specific online activities and problematic internet use.互联网的阴暗面:黑暗人格特质与特定在线活动和网络问题使用之间关联的初步证据。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):993-1003. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.109. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Dark Tetrad personality traits, paraphilic interests, and the role of impulsivity: an EEG-study using a Go/No-Go paradigm.黑暗人格特质四联征、性癖好与冲动性的作用:使用 Go/No-Go 范式的脑电图研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61214-z.
10
The Spanish Short Dark Tetrad (SD4): Association With Personality and Psychological Problems.西班牙短暗黑四因素(SD4):与人格和心理问题的关联。
Psicothema. 2024 May;36(2):195-204. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2023.172.

本文引用的文献

1
Haters Gonna Hate, Trolls Gonna Troll: The Personality Profile of a Facebook Troll.恨者自会恨,喷子自会喷:脸书喷子的性格剖析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115722.
2
High Esteem and Hurting Others Online: Trait Sadism Moderates the Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Internet Trolling.高自尊与网络伤害他人:特质性施虐倾向调节自尊与网络恶搞之间的关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Jul;23(7):441-446. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0652. Epub 2020 May 4.
3
Workplace bullies, not their victims, score high on the Dark Triad and Extraversion, and low on Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility.
职场霸凌者,而非其受害者,在黑暗三性格特质(黑暗三联征)和外向性方面得分高,而在宜人性和诚实谦逊方面得分低。
Heliyon. 2019 Oct 11;5(10):e02609. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02609. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Empathy at the Heart of Darkness: Empathy Deficits That Bind the Dark Triad and Those That Mediate Indirect Relational Aggression.黑暗核心中的同理心:将黑暗三元组联系起来的同理心缺陷以及介导间接关系攻击的同理心缺陷。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 12;10:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00095. eCollection 2019.
5
The dark side of internet: Preliminary evidence for the associations of dark personality traits with specific online activities and problematic internet use.互联网的阴暗面:黑暗人格特质与特定在线活动和网络问题使用之间关联的初步证据。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):993-1003. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.109. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
Cyberbullying Among Adolescent Bystanders: Role of Affective Versus Cognitive Empathy in Increasing Prosocial Cyberbystander Behavior.青少年旁观者中的网络欺凌:情感共情与认知共情在增加亲社会网络旁观者行为中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 30;9:799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799. eCollection 2018.
7
The Malevolent Side of Human Nature.人性的阴暗面
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):183-204. doi: 10.1177/1745691616666070.
8
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models.结构模型中的拟合指数、拉格朗日乘数、约束变化和不完整数据。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):163-72. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3.
9
Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents.简短报告:网络欺凌事件中的旁观者效应。
J Adolesc. 2015 Aug;43:96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Combating weight-based cyberbullying on Facebook with the dissenter effect.利用异议效应在脸书上对抗基于体重的网络欺凌。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 May;17(5):281-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0370. Epub 2014 Apr 1.