Kim Audrey, Nyandoro Munyaradzi G, Vu Linda, Rajan Ruben, Jacob Abraham
General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, AUS.
General and Colorectal Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, AUS.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59339. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Background Anastomosis formed in minimally invasive laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) may be achieved intra-corporeally (ICA) or extra-corporeally (ECA). This study compared the return of bowel function and other associated early patient outcomes and morbidity rates after an ICA or ECA in LRH. Methodology The study conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of elective LRH from January 2021 to September 2023. Patient demographics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Ninety participants underwent LRH, and the anastomotic type was evenly distributed - with male patients comprising 53 (58.9%) of the total. The mean age was 64 (standard deviation [SD] ±16.8) years, and the median body mass index (BMI) was 27.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.8). The mean follow-up period was 5.1 (SD ± 6.0) months. Univariate analysis showed that ICA had a shorter time for return of bowel function ( < 0.01). Additionally, ICA was associated with lower pain scores ( < 0.01), low morbidity ( = 0.02), and shorter hospital stays ( = 0.01). When comparing ICA to ECA, no significant difference was observed for procedure duration ( = 0.13), anastomotic leak (AL, = 1.00), surgical-site infections ( = 0.36), lymph node yield ( = 0.26), and any-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for statistically insignificant confounding factors, revealed that ECA was significantly and independently associated with increased time to first flatus (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, = 0.01) and higher average postoperative pain (OR 1.5, = 0.02) compared to ICA. Conclusions This single-center experience showed that ICA is associated with a quicker return to normal bowel function and low morbidity outcomes. ICA participants were positively associated with clinically relevant and health economics outcomes of shorter hospital stays without significantly adding to the procedure's duration times or compromising principles of oncological resection yield.
在微创腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(LRH)中形成的吻合可在体内(ICA)或体外(ECA)完成。本研究比较了LRH中ICA或ECA后肠功能恢复及其他相关早期患者结局和发病率。
本研究对2021年1月至2023年9月择期LRH进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 29.0版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)分析患者人口统计学、手术技术和结局。
90名参与者接受了LRH,吻合类型分布均匀,男性患者占总数的53名(58.9%)。平均年龄为64岁(标准差[SD]±16.8),中位体重指数(BMI)为27.0(四分位间距[IQR]=7.8)。平均随访期为5.1个月(SD±6.0)。单因素分析显示,ICA的肠功能恢复时间较短(<0.01)。此外,ICA与较低的疼痛评分(<0.01)、低发病率(=0.02)和较短的住院时间(=0.01)相关。将ICA与ECA进行比较时,在手术时间(=0.13)、吻合口漏(AL,=1.00)、手术部位感染(=0.36)、淋巴结收获量(=0.26)和全因死亡率方面未观察到显著差异。多因素逻辑回归在控制了无统计学意义的混杂因素后显示,与ICA相比,ECA与首次排气时间延长(优势比[OR]2.3,=0.01)和术后平均疼痛较高(OR 1.5,=0.02)显著且独立相关。
这一单中心经验表明,ICA与更快恢复正常肠功能和低发病率结局相关。ICA参与者与住院时间较短的临床相关和卫生经济学结局呈正相关,且不会显著增加手术时间或损害肿瘤切除收获原则。