• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的体内与体外吻合:短期结果

Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Short-Term Outcomes.

作者信息

Biondi Antonio, Di Mauro Gianluca, Morici Riccardo, Sangiorgio Giuseppe, Vacante Marco, Basile Francesco

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy.

Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, 95123 Catania, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 19;10(24):5967. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245967.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10245967
PMID:34945264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8705171/
Abstract

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy represents an effective therapeutic approach for right colon cancer (RCC). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate bowel function recovery, length of hospital stay, operative time, and the number of general and anastomosis-related postoperative complications from intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) vs. extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA); the secondary outcome was the number of lymph nodes retrieved. This observational study was conducted on 108 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy for RCC; after surgical resection, 64 patients underwent ICA and 44 underwent ECA. The operative time was slightly longer in the ICA group than in the ECA group, even though the difference was not significant (199.31 ± 48.90 min vs. 183.64 ± 35.80 min; = 0.109). The length of hospital stay (7.53 ± 1.91 days vs. 8.77 ± 3.66 days; = 0.036) and bowel function recovery (2.21 ± 1.01 days vs. 3.45 ± 1.82 days; < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the ICA group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (12% in ICA group vs. 9% in ECA group), wound infection (6% in ICA group vs. 7% in ECA group), or anastomotic leakage (6% in ICA group vs. 9% in ECA group). We did not observe a significant difference between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes collected (19.46 ± 7.06 in ICA group vs. 22.68 ± 8.79 in ECA group; = 0.086). ICA following laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, compared to ECA, could lead to a significant improvement in bowel function recovery and a reduction in the length of hospital stay in RCC patients.

摘要

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术是治疗右结肠癌(RCC)的一种有效方法。本研究的主要目的是评估体内吻合(ICA)与体外吻合(ECA)的肠道功能恢复情况、住院时间、手术时间以及一般和吻合相关术后并发症的数量;次要结果是获取的淋巴结数量。本观察性研究对108例行RCC右半结肠切除术的患者进行;手术切除后,64例患者接受ICA,44例接受ECA。ICA组的手术时间略长于ECA组,尽管差异不显著(199.31±48.90分钟对183.64±35.80分钟;P = 0.109)。ICA组的住院时间(7.53±1.91天对8.77±3.66天;P = 0.036)和肠道功能恢复时间(2.21±1.01天对3.45±1.82天;P<0.0001)显著更短。术后并发症(ICA组12%对ECA组9%)、伤口感染(ICA组6%对ECA组7%)或吻合口漏(ICA组6%对ECA组9%)无显著差异。两组收集的淋巴结数量无显著差异(ICA组19.46±7.06个对ECA组22.68±8.79个;P = 0.086)。与ECA相比,腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后行ICA可显著改善RCC患者的肠道功能恢复情况并缩短住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e20/8705171/c3a1e15facb6/jcm-10-05967-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e20/8705171/c3a1e15facb6/jcm-10-05967-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e20/8705171/c3a1e15facb6/jcm-10-05967-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的体内与体外吻合:短期结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 19;10(24):5967. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245967.
2
Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外周吻合与腔内吻合的成本效益分析。
Ann Ital Chir. 2020;91:49-54.
3
Clinical Outcomes after Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中经体内吻合与体外吻合的临床结局比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 29;60(7):1073. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071073.
4
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创右半结肠切除术后的体内或体外吻合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1007-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02850-x. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence.随机对照试验的荟萃分析比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外置吻合与内置吻合:证据水平升级。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00948-7. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的体外吻合与体内吻合比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jan;31(1):112-118. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1757464. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
A retrospective cohort study of intra-corporeal versus extra-corporeal anastomosis for right hemicolectomy with cost-effectiveness analysis.回顾性队列研究:比较右半结肠切除术行肠内吻合与肠外吻合的效果,并进行成本效益分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jun 8;28(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02944-0.
8
Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study with Retrospective Control on Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis.腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术切口疝:一种腔内心与腔外吻合的前瞻性研究与回顾性对照
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):113-119. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0453. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
9
Extent of Lymph Node Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Right Hemicolectomy.淋巴结清扫范围:右半结肠切除术中经体内吻合与经体外吻合的回顾性队列比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Nov;33(11):1058-1063. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0246. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
10
Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.肿瘤性右半结肠切除术行体腔内吻合与体腔外吻合的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Apr;36(4):645-656. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03807-4. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis preference for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: A combined SAGES and EAES survey.微创右半结肠切除术的体内与体外吻合偏好:SAGES和EAES联合调查
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11929-5.
2
Short-term outcomes for intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer-a prospective cohort study (ICEA-study).腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中体内与体外吻合的短期结局——一项前瞻性队列研究(ICEA研究)
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr 8;40(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04882-1.
3
Comparison of different surgical techniques and anastomosis methods in short-term outcomes of right colon cancer: a network meta-analysis of open surgery, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (The IVEA-study).腹腔镜右半结肠切除术患者行体腔内吻合与体腔外吻合的多中心随机临床试验(IVEA 研究)。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 May 3;31(4):408-413. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000937.
2
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right colectomy - a protocol for a randomised trial.右半结肠切除术的体腔内吻合与体腔外吻合:一项随机试验方案。
Dan Med J. 2021 Apr 20;68(5):A09200710.
3
Outcomes of Intra- versus Extra-Corporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis after Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy for Cancer: An Observational Study.
不同手术技术和吻合方法对右结肠癌短期预后的比较:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术联合体外和体内吻合的网状Meta分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):309-325. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02096-2. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
4
Clinical Outcomes after Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中经体内吻合与体外吻合的临床结局比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 29;60(7):1073. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071073.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:系统评价证据。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 11;18(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01862-5.
6
Implementation of totally robotic right hemicolectomy: lessons learned from a prospective cohort.完全机器人右半结肠切除术的实施:前瞻性队列研究中的经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2315-2321. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01646-3. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection: retrospective multicentre study.腹腔镜横结肠癌切除术中体外与体内吻合的病理和围手术期结果:回顾性多中心研究。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad045.
癌症微创右半结肠切除术后体内与体外回结肠吻合术的效果:一项观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 15;10(2):307. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020307.
4
Review of Colonic Anastomotic Leakage and Prevention Methods.结肠吻合口漏及其预防方法综述
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 16;9(12):4061. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124061.
5
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on long-term survival in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.左侧结直肠癌手术中吻合口漏的危险因素及其对长期生存的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 14;18(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01968-8.
6
Nomograms for morbidity and mortality after oncologic colon resection in the enhanced recovery era: results from a multicentric prospective national study.增强康复时代后肿瘤结肠切除术后发病率和死亡率的列线图:一项多中心前瞻性全国研究的结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;35(12):2227-2238. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03692-x. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
Intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis of 3699 patients.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的腔内吻合与腔外吻合:3699 例患者的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1673-1680. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03675-y. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive colectomy.微创结肠切除术中的体内吻合与体外吻合
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Jun;11(3):500-507. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.12.02.
9
Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.结直肠癌患者的手术并发症
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 11;55:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.024. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Clinical impact of leakage in patients with handsewn vs stapled anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study.右半结肠切除术后手工缝合与吻合器吻合患者吻合口漏的临床影响:一项回顾性研究
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Oct;22(10):1286-1292. doi: 10.1111/codi.15098. Epub 2020 May 26.