• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外周吻合与腔内吻合的成本效益分析。

Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2020;91:49-54.

PMID:32180579
Abstract

AIM

The cost effectiveness of the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is still debated, and the current literature does not allow to be drawn certain conclusion. Our study compared direct clinical costs and outcomes for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with the two most used type of anastomosis, such as ExtraCorporeal Anastomosis (ECA) and IntraCorporeal Anastomosis (ICA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis between January 2016 and April 2018 were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anastomosis: ECA or ICA.

RESULTS

Thirty ECA and twenty-nine ICA patients were included in the study. Operative time was significantly longer in ICA group than ECA group (p < 0.001). No significant differences between the groups were seen in terms of timeto- first flatus, postoperative complications and re-admission rate. ICA group showed a shorter hospitalization (5 vs 6; p < 0.022). In the ICA group, considering only the surgical tools were more expensive than in ECA (1435.6 € vs 72 €). Nevertheless, the total cost of the two procedures in similar (14451.36 € in ECA group vs 14631.04 € in ICA group).

CONCLUSION

ECA and ICA are comparable in terms of postoperative outcomes. ICA requires much more expensive charges, compared to a minor hospitalization. The ECA seems to be less expensive in terms of surgical supplies but the longer recovery determines an increase in the total cost resulting in a non-inferiority of one compared to the other technique.

KEY WORDS

Cost-analysis, ExtraCorporeal Anastomosis, IntraCorporeal Anastomosis, Laparoscopy, Right Hemicolectomy.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的成本效益仍存在争议,目前的文献尚无法得出明确的结论。我们的研究比较了腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与两种最常用的吻合术(即体外吻合术[ECA]和体内吻合术[ICA])的直接临床成本和结果。

材料和方法

在这项回顾性研究中,评估了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月期间接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术并进行体内和体外吻合的所有患者。根据吻合术的类型,患者分为 ECA 组和 ICA 组。

结果

纳入研究的 ECA 组有 30 例,ICA 组有 29 例。ICA 组的手术时间明显长于 ECA 组(p < 0.001)。两组在首次排气时间、术后并发症和再入院率方面无显著差异。ICA 组的住院时间较短(5 天比 6 天;p < 0.022)。在 ICA 组中,仅考虑手术器械的费用就比 ECA 组高(1435.6 欧元比 72 欧元)。然而,两种手术的总费用相似(ECA 组为 14451.36 欧元,ICA 组为 14631.04 欧元)。

结论

在术后结果方面,ECA 和 ICA 具有可比性。与较短的住院时间相比,ICA 需要更昂贵的费用。与手术耗材相比,ECA 的费用较低,但较长的恢复期导致总费用增加,使得两者在成本方面没有显著差异。

关键词

成本分析,体外吻合术,体内吻合术,腹腔镜,右半结肠切除术。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: cost-effectiveness analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外周吻合与腔内吻合的成本效益分析。
Ann Ital Chir. 2020;91:49-54.
2
A retrospective cohort study of intra-corporeal versus extra-corporeal anastomosis for right hemicolectomy with cost-effectiveness analysis.回顾性队列研究:比较右半结肠切除术行肠内吻合与肠外吻合的效果,并进行成本效益分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jun 8;28(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02944-0.
3
Clinical Outcomes after Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中经体内吻合与体外吻合的临床结局比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 29;60(7):1073. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071073.
4
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创右半结肠切除术后的体内或体外吻合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1007-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02850-x. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Intracorporeal Anastomosis and ERAS Program: The Winning Combination of Optimized Postoperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy.腔内置吻合与 ERAS 方案:优化腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后转归的最佳组合。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Oct 1;33(5):533-539. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001205.
6
Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的体外吻合与体内吻合比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jan;31(1):112-118. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1757464. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的体内与体外吻合:短期结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 19;10(24):5967. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245967.
8
Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study with Retrospective Control on Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis.腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术切口疝:一种腔内心与腔外吻合的前瞻性研究与回顾性对照
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):113-119. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0453. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
9
Early outcomes from the Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis study (MIRCAST).微创右结肠吻合术研究(MIRCAST)的早期结果。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1153-1160. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad077.
10
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence.随机对照试验的荟萃分析比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外置吻合与内置吻合:证据水平升级。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00948-7. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on surgical approach and intestinal anastomosis methods for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: A review.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的手术入路及肠吻合方法的研究进展:综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43956. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043956.
2
Intracorporeal stapled versus extracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis in minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision - a retrospective single center analysis.完全结肠系膜切除的微创右半结肠切除术中体内吻合器吻合与体外手工缝合吻合的回顾性单中心分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 9;410(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03749-x.
3
A retrospective cohort study of intra-corporeal versus extra-corporeal anastomosis for right hemicolectomy with cost-effectiveness analysis.
回顾性队列研究:比较右半结肠切除术行肠内吻合与肠外吻合的效果,并进行成本效益分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jun 8;28(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02944-0.
4
Laparoscopic assisted colectomy versus laparoscopic complete colectomy: a cost analysis.腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术与腹腔镜全结肠切除术:成本分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2151-2162. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01876-6. Epub 2024 May 17.
5
Single-Center Experiences: A Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis Outcomes in Right Hemicolectomy.单中心经验:右半结肠切除术中体内与体外吻合术结果的比较
Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59339. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内与体外吻合的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):375-396. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01737-8. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective study.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的体内吻合与体外吻合:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 20;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03023-8.
8
Extracorporeal Hand-Sewn vs. Intracorporeal Mechanic Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Right Colectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中外置手缝与内置机械吻合的比较。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00039.
9
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of anastomotic complications.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内与体外吻合术:吻合口并发症的回顾性队列研究
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;39(2):147-155. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00983.0140. Epub 2022 Mar 29.