• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

插管和未插管重症监护幸存者的心理症状与健康相关生活质量:一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。

Psychological symptoms and health-related quality of life in intubated and non-intubated intensive care survivors: A multicentre, prospective observational cohort study.

作者信息

Rai Sumeet, Neeman Teresa, Brown Rhonda, Sundararajan Krishnaswamy, Rajamani Arvind, Miu Michelle, Panwar Rakshit, Nourse Mary, van Haren Frank M P, Mitchell Imogen, Needham Dale M

机构信息

School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 13;26(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.011. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.011
PMID:38690186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11056421/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term psychological symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in intubated versus non-intubated ICU survivors.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicentre observational cohort study.

SETTING

Four tertiary medical-surgical ICUs in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Intubated and non-intubated adult ICU survivors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

: clinically significant psychological symptoms at 3- and 12-month follow-up using Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome-14 for post-traumatic stress disorder; Depression, Anxiety Stress Scales-21 for depression, anxiety, and stress. : HRQOL, using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 133 ICU survivors, 54/116 (47 %) had at least one clinically significant psychological symptom (i.e., post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, stress) at follow-up. Clinically significant scores for psychological symptoms were observed in 26 (39 %) versus 16 (32 %) at 3-months [odds ratio 1.4, 95 % confidence interval (0.66-3.13), p = 0.38]; 23 (37 %) versus 10 (31 %) at 12-months [odds ratio 1.3, 95 % confidence interval (0.53-3.31), p = 0.57] of intubated versus non-intubated survivors, respectively. Usual activities and mobility were the most commonly affected HRQOL dimension, with >30 % at 3 versus months and >20 % at 12-months of overall survivors reporting ≥ moderate problems. There was no difference between the groups in any of the EQ5D dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-in-two (47 %) of the intubated and non-intubated ICU survivors reported clinically significant psychological symptoms at 3 and 12-month follow-ups. Overall, more than 30 % at 3-months and over 20 % at 12-months of the survivors in both groups had moderate or worse problems with their usual activities and mobility. The presence of psychological symptoms and HRQOL impairments was similar between the groups.

摘要

目的

比较插管与未插管的重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者的长期心理症状及健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

设计

前瞻性、多中心观察性队列研究。

地点

澳大利亚的四家三级医疗外科重症监护病房。

参与者

插管和未插管的成年ICU幸存者。

主要观察指标

在3个月和12个月随访时,使用创伤后应激综合征-14量表评估创伤后应激障碍的临床显著心理症状;使用抑郁、焦虑、压力量表-21评估抑郁、焦虑和压力。使用欧洲五维健康量表-5D-5L问卷评估HRQOL。

结果

在133名ICU幸存者中,54/116(47%)在随访时有至少一种临床显著心理症状(即创伤后应激障碍、焦虑、抑郁、压力)。在3个月时,插管幸存者中有26人(39%)出现临床显著心理症状评分,未插管幸存者中有16人(32%)出现该评分[比值比1.4,95%置信区间(0.66 - 3.13),p = 0.38];在12个月时,插管幸存者中有23人(37%),未插管幸存者中有10人(31%)出现该评分[比值比1.3,95%置信区间(0.53 - 3.31),p = 0.57]。日常活动和行动能力是HRQOL中最常受影响的维度,在3个月时超过30%的总体幸存者以及在12个月时超过20%的总体幸存者报告有中度或更严重的问题。两组在欧洲五维健康量表的任何维度上均无差异。

结论

近二分之一(47%)的插管和未插管ICU幸存者在3个月和12个月随访时报告有临床显著心理症状。总体而言,两组中超过30%的幸存者在3个月时以及超过20%的幸存者在12个月时在日常活动和行动能力方面存在中度或更严重的问题。两组中心理症状和HRQOL损害的情况相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/8a6118095597/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/470f625ff394/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/223bafeb1e05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/ba76f930e2e1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/8a6118095597/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/470f625ff394/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/223bafeb1e05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/ba76f930e2e1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f54/11056421/8a6118095597/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological symptoms and health-related quality of life in intubated and non-intubated intensive care survivors: A multicentre, prospective observational cohort study.插管和未插管重症监护幸存者的心理症状与健康相关生活质量:一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 13;26(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.011. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Long-term follow-up for Psychological stRess in Intensive CarE (PRICE) survivors: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study in Australian intensive care units.长期随访重症监护心理应激(PRICE)幸存者:澳大利亚重症监护病房多中心前瞻性观察队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e023310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023310.
3
Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: a UK-wide prospective cohort study.重症疾病后焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍:一项英国范围的前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Nov 23;22(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2223-6.
4
Early psychological screening of intensive care unit survivors: a prospective cohort study.重症监护病房幸存者的早期心理筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Nov 9;21(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1813-z.
5
Mental health symptoms in family members of COVID-19 ICU survivors 3 and 12 months after ICU admission: a multicentre prospective cohort study.COVID-19 重症监护病房幸存者的家庭成员在 ICU 入住后 3 个月和 12 个月时的心理健康症状:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Mar;48(3):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06615-8. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Effect of intensive care unit-specific virtual reality (ICU-VR) to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in COVID-19 ICU survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.新冠肺炎 ICU 幸存者中强化治疗病房特定虚拟现实(ICU-VR)对改善心理健康和生活质量的效果:一项多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 May 5;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05271-z.
7
Implementing an intensive care unit (ICU) diary program at a large academic medical center: Results from a randomized control trial evaluating psychological morbidity associated with critical illness.在一家大型学术医疗中心实施重症监护病房(ICU)日记方案:一项评估与危重病相关的心理发病率的随机对照试验结果。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
The Burden of Mental Illness Among Survivors of Critical Care-Risk Factors and Impact on Quality of Life: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.危重症幸存者中心理疾病负担——风险因素及对生活质量的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Caregiver burden and emotional wellbeing in informal caregivers to ICU survivors-A prospective cohort study.ICU 幸存者非专业照护者的照护负担和情绪健康:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jan;66(1):94-102. doi: 10.1111/aas.13988. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
10
Psychological distress and health-related quality of life in patients after hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center, observational study.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间住院患者的心理困扰和健康相关生活质量:一项单中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0255774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255774. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study.积极关怀:犬类辅助干预对重症监护病房患者及其家属焦虑情绪的影响:一项单中心、单臂研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Apr 28;7(5):e1258. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
Psychological symptoms, quality of life and dyadic relations in family members of intensive care survivors: a multicentre, prospective longitudinal cohort study.重症监护幸存者家庭成员的心理症状、生活质量和二元关系:一项多中心、前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01420-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes after Critical Illness.危重症后的结局
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 9;388(10):913-924. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2104669.
2
Long-term health-related quality of life, healthcare utilisation and back-to-work activities in intensive care unit survivors: Prospective confirmatory study from the Frisian aftercare cohort.重症监护病房幸存者的长期健康相关生活质量、医疗保健利用和重返工作活动:来自弗里斯兰康复队列的前瞻性验证性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 7;17(9):e0273348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273348. eCollection 2022.
3
Prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in Southeast Asian countries: A systematic review.
东南亚国家癌症患者心理困扰的患病率:系统评价。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13669. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13669. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
Exploring the Patient Experience with Noninvasive Ventilation: A Human-Centered Design Analysis to Inform Planning for Better Tolerance.探索无创通气患者体验:以用户为中心的设计分析以指导提高耐受性的规划。
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Jan 27;9(1):80-94. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0274.
5
Physical, Mental, and Cognitive Health Status of ICU Survivors Before ICU Admission: A Cohort Study.入住 ICU 前 ICU 幸存者的身体、心理和认知健康状况:一项队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1271-1279. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004443.
6
Health-related quality of life after critical care-the emperor's new clothes.重症监护后的健康相关生活质量——皇帝的新衣。
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 8;24(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03012-3.
7
Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护后综合征的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 May;33(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
8
"I had the feeling that I was trapped": a bedside qualitative study of cognitive and affective attitudes toward noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure.“我感觉自己被困住了”:一项关于急性呼吸衰竭患者对无创通气认知与情感态度的床边定性研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 2;9(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0608-6.
9
Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in adult critical care survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人重症监护幸存者创伤后应激障碍症状的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 Jun 11;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2489-3.
10
Long-term follow-up for Psychological stRess in Intensive CarE (PRICE) survivors: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study in Australian intensive care units.长期随访重症监护心理应激(PRICE)幸存者:澳大利亚重症监护病房多中心前瞻性观察队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e023310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023310.