系统评价和荟萃分析多学科干预措施在解决社区居住老年人药物滥用问题上的有效性。
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of multidisciplinary interventions to address polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults.
机构信息
Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain; Navarre Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Navarre Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain; Unit of Innovation and Organization, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
出版信息
Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Jul;98:102317. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102317. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Interventions to address polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults often focus on medication-related outcomes. The aim was to explore the impact of multidisciplinary interventions to manage polypharmacy on clinical outcomes for community-dwelling older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions by at least a pharmacist and a physician, indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE or CENTRAL up to January 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. Seventeen RCTs were included. Fifteen were rated as 'high' risk of bias. No relevant benefits were found in functional and cognitive status (primary outcomes), falls, mortality, quality of life, patient satisfaction, hospital admissions, emergency department or primary care visits. Interventions reduced medication costs, improved medication appropriateness (odds ratio [OR] 0.39), reduced number of medications (mean difference [MD] -0.57), resolved medication-related problems (MD -0.45), and improved medication adherence (relative risk [RR] 1.14). There was a low or very low certainty of the evidence for most outcomes. Multidisciplinary interventions to address polypharmacy appear effective in improving multiple dimensions of medication use. However, evidence for corresponding improvements in functional or cognitive status is scarce. New efficient models of multidisciplinary interventions to address polypharmacy impacting clinical outcomes should be explored.
干预措施通常侧重于与药物相关的结局,以解决社区居住的老年人的多重用药问题。本研究旨在探讨多学科干预措施对管理社区居住的老年人多重用药的临床结局的影响。本系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了截至 2023 年 1 月在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 或 CENTRAL 中索引的至少涉及药剂师和医生的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据确定性。共纳入 17 项 RCT,其中 15 项被评为“高”偏倚风险。在功能和认知状态(主要结局)、跌倒、死亡率、生活质量、患者满意度、住院、急诊或初级保健就诊方面,未发现相关获益。干预措施降低了药物成本,提高了药物适宜性(比值比 [OR] 0.39),减少了药物数量(平均差值 [MD] -0.57),解决了药物相关问题(MD -0.45),并提高了药物依从性(相对风险 [RR] 1.14)。对于大多数结局,证据确定性为低或极低。多学科干预措施在改善药物使用的多个维度方面似乎是有效的。然而,关于功能或认知状态相应改善的证据很少。应探索新的、有效的多学科干预措施模型,以解决多重用药问题并影响临床结局。