Shemer Maayan, Barzilai Omry, Marder Ofer
Department of Archaeology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105 Beer Sheva, Israel.
Archaeological Research Department, Israel Antiquities Authority, The National Campus for the Archaeology of Israel, 1 Nahman Avigad Street, 9370726 Jerusalem, Israel.
J Paleolit Archaeol. 2024;7(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s41982-024-00176-0. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
The chrono-cultural sequence of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic went through several major revisions during approximately a century of focused research, each revision contributing to shedding light on the mosaic of cultural entities and the complex social and cultural dynamics composing the Levantine Upper Paleolithic. The current state of research suggests the co-inhabitance of two cultural groups: the Early Ahmarian and the Levantine Aurignacian. Two other cultural entities, the Arkov-Divshon and the Atlitian, are regarded as younger manifestations and were tentatively suggested to relate to the Levantine Aurignacian. This paper presents a research synthesis of two case studies: Manot Cave, located in western Galilee, Israel, and Nahal Rahaf 2 Rockshelter in the Judean Desert. The application of high-resolution excavation methods, alongside detailed documentation of the stratigraphy and site-formation processes and wide-scale radiocarbon-based absolute dating, marked these sites as ideal for chrono-cultural study through the analyses of flint industries. The results indicate a clear distinction between the Levantine Aurignacian and the Arkov-Divshon/Atlitian industries and a chronological overlap between the Arkov-Divshon, Levantine Aurignacian, and possibly with the Early Ahmarian. Subsequently, we suggest another revision of the currently accepted chrono-cultural model: not two, but at least three cultural entities co-inhabited the Levant at ca. 40-30 ky cal BP. This study further suggests an evolvement of the Atlitian flint industries from the Arkov-Divshon and stresses the foreign cultural features of the Levantine Aurignacian. These results were used to construct an updated model of migration and possible interaction patterns.
在大约一个世纪的重点研究中,黎凡特旧石器时代晚期的年代文化序列经历了几次重大修订,每次修订都有助于阐明构成黎凡特旧石器时代晚期的文化实体拼图以及复杂的社会和文化动态。当前的研究状况表明存在两个文化群体共同居住:早期阿马里亚文化和黎凡特奥瑞纳文化。另外两个文化实体,阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化和阿提利坦文化,被视为较晚出现的文化表现形式,并初步认为与黎凡特奥瑞纳文化有关。本文呈现了两个案例研究的综合研究成果:位于以色列加利利西部的马诺特洞穴,以及犹大沙漠中的纳哈尔拉哈夫2号岩棚。高分辨率挖掘方法的应用,以及地层学和遗址形成过程的详细记录以及基于放射性碳的广泛绝对测年,使这些遗址成为通过燧石工业分析进行年代文化研究的理想场所。结果表明黎凡特奥瑞纳文化与阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申/阿提利坦文化工业之间存在明显区别,并且阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化、黎凡特奥瑞纳文化以及可能还有早期阿马里亚文化之间存在时间上的重叠。随后,我们建议对目前被接受的年代文化模型进行另一次修订:在约40 - 30千卡公元前,居住在黎凡特的不是两个,而是至少三个文化实体。这项研究进一步表明阿提利坦燧石工业是从阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化演变而来,并强调了黎凡特奥瑞纳文化的外来文化特征。这些结果被用于构建一个更新的移民和可能的互动模式模型。