Shemer Maayan, Boaretto Elisabetta, Greenbaum Noam, Bar-Yosef Mayer Daniella E, Tejero Jose-Miguel, Langgut Dafna, Gnezdilov Dariya Lokshin, Barzilai Omry, Marder Ofer, Marom Nimrod
Department of Bible, Archaeology and the Ancient Near East, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel; Archaeological Research Department, Israel Antiquities Authority, P.O. Box 586, Jerusalem 9100402, Israel.
Dangoor Research Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Rehovot, Israel.
J Hum Evol. 2023 May;178:103342. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103342. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
The Levantine Early Upper Paleolithic (ca. 45-30 ka) has been a focus of research because of its unique position as a conduit of human, flora, and fauna species between Africa and Eurasia. Studies have mainly focused on the Early Ahmarian and Levantine Aurignacian, two entities, the former endemic and the latter foreign, which are considered to have coinhabited the region during that period. However, other cultural entities, such as the Atlitian in the Mediterranean region and the Arkov-Divshon in the arid regions of the southern Levant received less attention, and accordingly, suffer from broad definitions and chronological insecurity. These cultures hold potential insights regarding nuanced adaptations, reciprocal influences, and diachronic assimilation processes. The recently discovered site of Nahal Rahaf 2 Rockshelter in the Judean Desert provides integral information on one of these entities-the Arkov-Divshon. Two excavation seasons revealed a sequence of archaeological layers, with lithic assemblages in which laterally carinated items were prominent. Alongside rich faunal assemblages, other components of the material culture include perforated marine shells and bone tools, marking the first association of these elements with Arkov-Divshon and implying some degree of contact with the Mediterranean regions of the Levant. Good preservation of organic materials allowed radiocarbon dating of the human occupation at the site to ca. 37.5-34.0 ka cal BP, indicating chronological overlap with the Levantine Aurignacian, and possibly also with the latest phases of the Early Ahmarian. Thus, challenging the validity of the widely accepted 'Two Tradition' Model of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic. Lithic analyses suggest the use of one main reduction sequence and the primary production of bladelets from carinated items. Faunal remains suggest targeted hunting of ibex and gazelle. Botanical remains and sedimentary analyses suggest roughly similar environmental conditions, with a possible woodier environment in the surroundings of the site.
黎凡特旧石器时代晚期早期(约45 - 30 ka)因其作为非洲和欧亚大陆之间人类、动植物物种通道的独特地位,一直是研究的焦点。研究主要集中在早期阿马里亚文化和黎凡特奥瑞纳文化这两个实体上,前者是本土文化,后者是外来文化,被认为在那个时期共同存在于该地区。然而,其他文化实体,如地中海地区的阿提利坦文化和黎凡特南部干旱地区的阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化受到的关注较少,因此存在定义宽泛和年代不确定的问题。这些文化对于细微的适应、相互影响和历时性同化过程具有潜在的见解。最近在犹大沙漠发现的纳哈尔拉哈夫2号岩棚遗址提供了关于这些实体之一——阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化的完整信息。两个挖掘季节揭示了一系列考古层,其石器组合中侧面有棱脊的物品很突出。除了丰富的动物群组合外,物质文化的其他组成部分包括穿孔海贝壳和骨器,这标志着这些元素首次与阿尔科夫 - 迪夫申文化相关联,并暗示与黎凡特的地中海地区有一定程度的接触。有机材料的良好保存使得对该遗址人类居住层进行放射性碳测年,结果显示为约37.5 - 34.0 ka cal BP,表明其年代与黎凡特奥瑞纳文化有重叠,甚至可能与早期阿马里亚文化的最晚阶段也有重叠。因此,对黎凡特旧石器时代晚期被广泛接受的“两种传统”模型的有效性提出了挑战。石器分析表明使用了一种主要的石器制作流程,并且主要从有棱脊的物品上生产刀片。动物遗骸表明有针对性地捕猎野山羊和瞪羚。植物遗骸和沉积分析表明环境条件大致相似,遗址周边可能有更茂密的树林环境。