Ye Jianjun, Zhang Chichen, Zheng Lei, Wang Qihao, Wu Qiyou, Tu Xiang, Bao Yige, Wei Qiang
Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Apr 22;64:1. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.04.001. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This study aimed to determine the difference in prostate volume (PV) derived from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and to further investigate the role of TRUS prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and mpMRI-PSAD in prostate cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men.
Patients who underwent an initial prostate biopsy within 3 mo after mpMRI between January 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of both TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for PCa detection were calculated and compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot, and receiver operating characteristic curve were also utilized to explore the interests of this study.
The median prostate-specific antigen level of 875 patients was 9.79 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.09-13.50) ng/ml. The median mpMRI-PV and TRUS-PV were 41.92 (IQR: 29.29-60.73) and 41.04 (IQR: 29.24-57.27) ml, respectively, demonstrating a strong linear correlation ( = 0.831, 95% confidence interval: 0.809, 0.850; < 0.01) and sufficient agreement. No significant difference was observed in terms of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV between TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for any PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection. The overall discriminative ability of TRUS-PSAD for detecting PCa or non-PCa, as well as csPCa and non-csPCa, was comparable with that of mpMRI-PSAD, and similar results were also observed in the subsequent analysis stratified by mpMRI-PV quartiles, prostate-specific antigen level, and age. The limitations include the retrospective and single-center nature and a lack of follow-up information.
TRUS-PV and MRI-PV exhibited a strong linear correlation and reached sufficient agreement. The efficiency of TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for PCa detection was comparable. TRUS could be used for PV estimation and dynamic monitoring of PSAD, and TRUS-PSAD could effectively guide clinical decision-making and optimize diagnostic strategies.
In this work, prostate volume (PV) derived from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) exhibited a strong linear correlation with the PV derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). The efficiency of TRUS prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and mpMRI-PSAD for the detection of prostate cancer was comparable. TRUS could be used for PV estimation and TRUS-PSAD could help in clinical decision-making and optimizing diagnostic strategies.
本研究旨在确定经直肠超声(TRUS)和多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)得出的前列腺体积(PV)的差异,并进一步探讨TRUS前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)和mpMRI-PSAD在未进行活检的男性前列腺癌(PCa)检测中的作用。
回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年12月期间在mpMRI检查后3个月内接受初次前列腺活检的患者。计算并比较TRUS-PSAD和mpMRI-PSAD检测PCa的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。还利用Pearson相关系数、Bland-Altman图和受试者工作特征曲线来探究本研究的关注点。
875例患者的前列腺特异性抗原水平中位数为9.79(四分位间距[IQR]:7.09 - 13.50)ng/ml。mpMRI-PV和TRUS-PV的中位数分别为41.92(IQR:29.29 - 60.73)和41.04(IQR:29.24 - 57.27)ml,显示出强线性相关性(r = 0.831,95%置信区间:0.809,0.850;P < 0.01)且一致性良好。在检测任何PCa和临床显著PCa(csPCa)方面,TRUS-PSAD和mpMRI-PSAD的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV均未观察到显著差异。TRUS-PSAD检测PCa与非PCa以及csPCa与非csPCa的总体鉴别能力与mpMRI-PSAD相当,在随后按mpMRI-PV四分位数、前列腺特异性抗原水平和年龄分层的分析中也观察到类似结果。局限性包括研究的回顾性、单中心性质以及缺乏随访信息。
TRUS-PV和MRI-PV表现出强线性相关性且一致性良好。TRUS-PSAD和mpMRI-PSAD检测PCa的效率相当。TRUS可用于PV估计和PSAD的动态监测,TRUS-PSAD可有效指导临床决策并优化诊断策略。
在本研究中,经直肠超声(TRUS)得出的前列腺体积(PV)与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)得出的PV表现出强线性相关性。TRUS前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)和mpMRI-PSAD检测前列腺癌的效率相当。TRUS可用于PV估计,TRUS-PSAD有助于临床决策和优化诊断策略。