• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索格列净与达格列净对改善糖尿病伴心力衰竭恶化患者结局的比较:每项结局的成本分析

Sotagliflozin versus dapagliflozin to improve outcome of patients with diabetes and worsening heart failure: a cost per outcome analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Weichen, Yu Meichen, Cheng Guohua

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1373314. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1373314. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1373314
PMID:38694909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure.

METHOD

The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOIST-WHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses.

RESULT

The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage.

CONCLUSION

In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes.

摘要

背景与目的

达格列净可抑制钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2),而索格列净属于一类新型的双重作用SGLT-1/SGLT-2抑制剂,因其疗效和安全性而备受关注。达格列净和索格列净在治疗糖尿病/非糖尿病心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭恶化方面均发挥着重要作用。因此,本文旨在分析和比较这两种药物在预防糖尿病相关心力衰竭患者发生一次事件时的每结局成本。

方法

采用治疗所需成本(CNT)来计算预防一次事件的成本,所需治疗人数(NNT)表示需要进行干预治疗以预防一次不良事件的预期患者人数,或需要多次治疗以实现有益结局的预期患者人数。疗效和安全性数据来自两项已发表的临床试验DAPA-HF和SOLOIST-WHF的结果。由于两种药物上市时间存在差异,我们临时分析了达格列净的价格以计算同一时间范围内索格列净的价格。次要分析旨在评估CNT研究的稳定性,并通过单向敏感性分析尽量减少随机对照试验对照组和试验组结果之间的差异。

结果

最终结果显示,索格列净预防一次事件的年化所需治疗人数(aNNT)为4(95%CI 3-7),而达格列净为23(95%CI 16-55)。我们计算得出达格列净预防一次事件的成本(CNT)为109,043美元(95%CI 75,856美元-260,755美元)。索格列净的价格设定在27,260美元以下,具有明显优势。敏感性分析表明,索格列净可能具有成本优势。

结论

在本研究中,观察到索格列净在预防糖尿病患者发生一次事件、心血管死亡率或全因死亡率方面比达格列净具有价格优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/8a3f5d41d76b/fphar-15-1373314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/6b24606fc106/fphar-15-1373314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/bfd4936baec5/fphar-15-1373314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/8a3f5d41d76b/fphar-15-1373314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/6b24606fc106/fphar-15-1373314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/bfd4936baec5/fphar-15-1373314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07b7/11061456/8a3f5d41d76b/fphar-15-1373314-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sotagliflozin versus dapagliflozin to improve outcome of patients with diabetes and worsening heart failure: a cost per outcome analysis.索格列净与达格列净对改善糖尿病伴心力衰竭恶化患者结局的比较:每项结局的成本分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1373314. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1373314. eCollection 2024.
2
Sotagliflozin vs Dapagliflozin: A Systematic Review Comparing Cardiovascular Mortality.索格列净与达格列净对比:一项比较心血管死亡率的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Sep 19;15(9):e45525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45525. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice for Heart Failure Prevention and Treatment: Beyond Type 2 Diabetes. A Narrative Review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在心力衰竭预防和治疗中的临床应用:超越 2 型糖尿病。一篇叙述性综述。
Adv Ther. 2022 Feb;39(2):845-861. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01989-z. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Dapagliflozin vs. sacubitril-valsartan for prevention of heart failure events in non-diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction: a cost per outcome analysis.达格列净对比沙库巴曲缬沙坦用于预防射血分数降低的非糖尿病心力衰竭事件:一项基于结局的成本分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Dec 29;28(15):1665-1669. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa136.
5
Sotagliflozin: Efficacy, Safety, and Potential Therapeutic Applications in Heart Failure.索格列净:在心力衰竭中的疗效、安全性和潜在治疗应用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Sep;58(9):935-946. doi: 10.1177/10600280231211179. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Effect of Dapagliflozin Versus Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Cost per Outcome Analysis.达格列净与恩格列净对射血分数不同心衰患者心血管死亡的影响:基于结局的成本分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 May;23(3):323-328. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00578-5. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Sotagliflozin in SOLOIST-WHF.索格列净在 SOLOIST-WHF 中的成本效益。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Sep;12(9):1600-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Effects of Sotagliflozin on Health Status in Patients With Worsening Heart Failure: Results From SOLOIST-WHF.索格列净对射血分数降低的心力衰竭恶化患者健康状况的影响:SOLOIST-WHF 研究结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Sep 17;84(12):1078-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.036.
9
Indirect comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure: evidence based on Bayesian methods.基于贝叶斯方法的已确诊心力衰竭患者中 SGLT2 抑制剂的间接比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1231-1241. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14297. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
10
Effect of Sotagliflozin on Early Mortality and Heart Failure-Related Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of SOLOIST-WHF.索格列净对早期死亡率和心力衰竭相关事件的影响:SOLOIST-WHF 的事后分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;11(8 Pt 1):879-889. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.05.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗心力衰竭合并2型糖尿病患者疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 2;104(18):e42196. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042196.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure.索格列净治疗伴有近期恶化心力衰竭的糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Jun;13(6):e230190. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0190. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Should Be Avoided for the Inpatient Management of Hyperglycemia.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂应避免用于住院患者高血糖的管理。
Endocr Pract. 2024 Apr;30(4):402-408. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.11.014. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
3
Sotagliflozin vs Dapagliflozin: A Systematic Review Comparing Cardiovascular Mortality.
索格列净与达格列净对比:一项比较心血管死亡率的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Sep 19;15(9):e45525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45525. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.达格列净和恩格列净治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的成本效益。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;376:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.080. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计数据-2023 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Recent Pharmacological Options in Type 2 Diabetes and Synergic Mechanism in Cardiovascular Disease.近期 2 型糖尿病的药理学选择及在心血管疾病中的协同机制
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 13;24(2):1646. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021646.
7
Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Study.慢性肾脏病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;9:802181. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.802181. eCollection 2022.
8
The molecular link between oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes: A target for new therapies against cardiovascular diseases.氧化应激、胰岛素抵抗与2型糖尿病之间的分子联系:心血管疾病新疗法的靶点
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;62:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
Sotagliflozin for patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.索格列净用于2型糖尿病患者:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Jan;24(1):106-114. doi: 10.1111/dom.14555. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.