Suppr超能文献

评估上肢重建的四肢瘫痪患者上肢肌肉力量和捏力与握力的共识

Toward Consensus in Assessing Upper Limb Muscle Strength and Pinch and Grip Strength in People With Tetraplegia Having Upper Limb Reconstructions.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Fall;27(3):70-82. doi: 10.46292/sci20-00012. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To reach agreement on standardized protocols for assessing upper limb strength and grip and pinch force for upper limb reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia.

METHODS

Selected members of an expert panel composed of international therapists formed at the 2018 International Congress for Upper Limb Surgery for Tetraplegia conducted a literature review of current practice that identified gaps and inconsistencies in measurement protocols and presented to workshop attendees. To resolve discrepancies, a set of questions was presented to workshop attendees who voted electronically. Consensus was set at 75% agreement.

RESULTS

For manual muscle testing, consensus was reached for using the Medical Research Council scale, without plus or minus, and the use of resistance through range when testing grade 4 and grade 5 strength. Pectoralis major and serratus anterior should be routinely tested, however there was no consensus on other shoulder muscles. Grip and pinch strength should be tested according to the American Society of Hand Therapists positioning. For grip strength, either the Jamar or Biometrics dynamometer expressed in kilograms should be used. For grip and pinch strength, three measurements should be performed at each testing. No consensus was reached on a device for pinch strength.

CONCLUSION

This work is an important step to enable comparable data in the future. Further consensus methods will work toward developing more comprehensive guidelines in this population. Building international consensus for pre- and postoperative measures of function supports objective evaluation of novel therapies and interpretation of multicenter studies.

摘要

目的

就评估四肢瘫痪上肢重建手术上肢力量和握力及捏力的标准化方案达成一致意见。

方法

由国际治疗师组成的专家小组的部分成员参加了 2018 年四肢瘫痪上肢手术国际大会,对当前实践进行了文献回顾,发现测量方案中存在差距和不一致之处,并向研讨会与会者进行了介绍。为了解决差异,向研讨会与会者提出了一组问题,他们通过电子方式进行投票。达成一致的标准为 75%的同意率。

结果

在手动肌肉测试方面,达成了使用无加号或减号的医学研究委员会量表以及在测试 4 级和 5 级力量时通过范围施加阻力的共识。胸大肌和前锯肌应常规进行测试,但对其他肩部肌肉没有达成共识。握力和捏力应根据美国手治疗师协会的定位进行测试。对于握力,应使用以千克为单位表示的 Jamar 或 Biometrics 测力计。对于握力和捏力,应在每次测试中进行三次测量。对于捏力的设备,没有达成共识。

结论

这项工作是未来实现可比数据的重要步骤。进一步的共识方法将努力制定该人群更全面的指南。建立术前和术后功能的国际共识,支持对新疗法的客观评估和对多中心研究的解释。

相似文献

3
Tendon Transfer Surgery for People With Tetraplegia: An Overview.四肢瘫痪患者的肌腱转移手术:概述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.034.

本文引用的文献

2
A Comparative Outcome Study of Hamstring Versus Tibialis Anterior and Synthetic Grafts for Deltoid to Triceps Transfers.
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Oct;42(10):833.e1-833.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
4
Tendon Transfer Surgery for People With Tetraplegia: An Overview.四肢瘫痪患者的肌腱转移手术:概述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.034.
5
9
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验