Donkin Liesje, Bidois-Putt Marie-Claire, Wilson Holly, Hayward Penelope, Chan Amy Hai Yan
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 2;8:e50385. doi: 10.2196/50385.
Indigenous communities often have poorer health outcomes and services under traditional models of care. In New Zealand, this holds true for Māori people who are tāngata whenua (the indigenous people). Several barriers exist that decrease the likelihood of indigenous communities often have poorer health outcomes and poor service fit under traditional models of care, including access issues, systemic and provider racism, and a lack of culturally safe and responsive services. Web-based interventions (WBIs) have been shown to be effective in supporting mental health and well-being and can overcome some of these barriers. Despite the large number of WBIs developed, more investigation is needed to know how well WBIs fit with an indigenous worldview and how they meet the needs of indigenous communities so that a digitally based future does not drive social and health inequities.
This study aims to explore the goodness-of-fit of WBIs of Māori individuals, the indigenous people of Aotearoa/New Zealand.
We used interviews (n=3) and focus groups (n=5) with 30 Māori participants to explore their views about WBIs. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis by members of the research team.
Overall, there was a perception that the design of WBIs did not align with the Māori worldview, which centers around people, relationships, spirituality, and holistic views of well-being. A total of 4 key themes and several subthemes emerged, indicating that WBIs were generally considered a poor fit for Māori. Specifically, the themes were as follows: (1) WBIs are disconnected from the core values of te ao Māori (the Māori worldview), (2) WBIs could be helpful in the right context, (3) there are significant barriers that may make it harder for Māori to use WBIs than other groups, and (4) ways to improve WBIs to help engagement with Māori.
While WBIs are often considered a way to reduce barriers to care, they may not meet the needs of Māori when used as a stand-alone intervention. If WBIs are continued to be offered, developers and researchers need to consider how to develop WBIs that are responsive and engaging to the needs of indigenous communities rather than driving inequities. Ideally, WBIs should be developed by the people they are intended for to fit with those populations' world views.
在传统护理模式下,原住民社区的健康状况往往较差,获得的服务也较少。在新西兰,对于作为原住民的毛利人来说也是如此。存在若干障碍,这些障碍降低了原住民社区在传统护理模式下健康状况较差且服务适配性不佳的可能性,包括获取服务的问题、系统性和提供者层面的种族主义,以及缺乏具有文化安全性和响应性的服务。基于网络的干预措施(WBIs)已被证明在支持心理健康和幸福感方面是有效的,并且可以克服其中一些障碍。尽管已经开发了大量的基于网络的干预措施,但仍需要更多的调查来了解这些措施与原住民世界观的契合程度,以及它们如何满足原住民社区的需求,以便数字化的未来不会加剧社会和健康不平等。
本研究旨在探讨针对新西兰奥塔哥/新西兰原住民毛利人的基于网络的干预措施的适配性。
我们对30名毛利参与者进行了访谈(n = 3)和焦点小组讨论(n = 5),以探讨他们对基于网络的干预措施的看法。研究团队成员使用反思性主题分析法对访谈进行了分析。
总体而言,人们认为基于网络的干预措施的设计与毛利人的世界观不一致,毛利人的世界观以人、人际关系、灵性和整体幸福感为核心。共出现了4个关键主题和几个子主题,表明基于网络的干预措施通常被认为不太适合毛利人。具体而言,主题如下:(1)基于网络的干预措施与毛利世界观(te ao Māori)的核心价值观脱节;(2)在合适的背景下,基于网络的干预措施可能会有帮助;(3)存在重大障碍,可能使毛利人比其他群体更难使用基于网络的干预措施;(4)改进基于网络的干预措施以促进与毛利人互动的方法。
虽然基于网络的干预措施通常被认为是减少护理障碍的一种方式,但作为单一干预措施使用时,它们可能无法满足毛利人的需求。如果继续提供基于网络的干预措施,开发者和研究人员需要考虑如何开发能够响应并满足原住民社区需求的基于网络的干预措施,而不是加剧不平等。理想情况下,基于网络的干预措施应由目标人群开发,以符合这些人群的世界观。