School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Health and Allied Professionals, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0301453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301453. eCollection 2024.
To map organisational interventions for workplace suicide prevention, identifying the effects, mechanisms, moderators, implementation and economic costs, and how interventions are evaluated.
Suicide is a devastating event that can have a profound and lasting impact on the individuals and families affected, with the highest rates found among adults of work age. Employers have a legal and ethical responsibility to provide a safe working environment for their employees, which includes addressing the issue of suicide and promoting mental health and well-being.
A realist perspective was taken, to identify within organisational suicide prevention interventions, what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Published and unpublished studies in six databases were searched. To extract and map data on the interventions the Effect, Mechanism, Moderator, Implementation, Economic (EMMIE) framework was used. Mechanisms were deductively analysed against Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological model.
From 3187 records screened, 46 papers describing 36 interventions within the military, healthcare, the construction industry, emergency services, office workers, veterinary surgeons, the energy sector and higher education. Most mechanisms were aimed at the individual's immediate environment, with the most common being education or training on recognising signs of stress, suicidality or mental illness in oneself. Studies examined the effectiveness of interventions in terms of suicide rates, suicidality or symptoms of mental illness, and changes in perceptions, attitudes or beliefs, with most reporting positive results. Few studies reported economic costs but those that did suggested that the interventions are cost-effective.
It seems likely that organisational suicide prevention programmes can have a positive impact on attitudes and beliefs towards suicide as well reducing the risk of suicide. Education, to support individuals to recognise the signs and symptoms of stress, mental ill health and suicidality in both themselves and others, is likely to be an effective starting point for successful interventions.
绘制组织干预措施以预防工作场所自杀,确定干预措施的效果、机制、调节因素、实施和经济成本,以及干预措施如何进行评估。
自杀是一种破坏性事件,会对受影响的个人和家庭产生深远而持久的影响,工作年龄段的成年人自杀率最高。雇主有法律和道德责任为员工提供安全的工作环境,其中包括解决自杀问题以及促进心理健康和幸福感。
采用现实主义观点,确定组织自杀预防干预措施中哪些措施有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效。在六个数据库中搜索已发表和未发表的研究。使用效果、机制、调节因素、实施和经济(EMMIE)框架提取和映射干预措施的数据。根据布伦芬布伦纳的社会生态模型对机制进行演绎分析。
从筛选出的 3187 条记录中,有 46 篇论文描述了军事、医疗保健、建筑行业、紧急服务、办公室工作人员、兽医、能源部门和高等教育领域的 36 项干预措施。大多数机制针对的是个人的直接环境,最常见的是教育或培训如何识别自身压力、自杀意念或精神疾病的迹象。研究从自杀率、自杀意念或精神疾病症状以及观念、态度或信仰的变化方面检验了干预措施的有效性,大多数研究报告结果为阳性。很少有研究报告经济成本,但那些报告的研究表明干预措施具有成本效益。
组织自杀预防计划似乎有可能对自杀态度和信念产生积极影响,并降低自杀风险。教育,以支持个人识别自身和他人的压力、精神健康不佳和自杀意念的迹象和症状,可能是成功干预的有效起点。