Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, CA 95817, United States.
Department of Public Health Sciences and MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Cereb Cortex. 2024 May 2;34(13):1-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae097.
Adolescence has been characterized as a period of risky and possibly suboptimal decision-making, yet the development of decision-making in autistic adolescents is not well understood. To investigate decision-making in autism, we evaluated performance on 2 computerized tasks capturing decision-making under explicit risk and uncertainty in autistic and non-autistic adolescents/young adults ages 12-22 years. Participants completed the Game of Dice Task (32 IQ-matched participant pairs) to assess decision-making under explicit risk and the modified Iowa Gambling Task (35 IQ-matched pairs) to assess decision-making under uncertainty. Autistic participants overall made riskier decisions than non-autistic participants on the Game of Dice Task, and the odds of making riskier decisions varied by age and IQ. In contrast, the autistic group showed comparable levels of learning over trial blocks to the non-autistic group on the modified Iowa Gambling Task. For both tasks, younger autistic participants performed poorer than their non-autistic counterparts, while group differences diminished in older ages. This age-related pattern suggests positive development during adolescence on risk assessment and decision-making in autism but also implies differential developmental trajectories between groups. These findings also suggest differential performance by the risk type, with additional complex influences of IQ and fluid cognition, which warrants further investigations.
青春期的特点是风险决策和可能的次优决策,但自闭症青少年的决策能力发展还不太清楚。为了研究自闭症患者的决策能力,我们评估了 12 至 22 岁自闭症和非自闭症青少年/年轻人在 2 个计算机任务中的表现,这两个任务分别捕捉了明确风险和不确定性下的决策。参与者完成了骰子游戏任务(32 对 IQ 匹配的参与者)以评估明确风险下的决策,以及修改后的爱荷华赌博任务(35 对 IQ 匹配的参与者)以评估不确定性下的决策。总体而言,自闭症参与者在骰子游戏任务中的风险决策比非自闭症参与者更为冒险,并且风险决策的可能性因年龄和智商而异。相比之下,在修改后的爱荷华赌博任务中,自闭症组在试验块中的学习水平与非自闭症组相当。对于这两个任务,年龄较小的自闭症参与者的表现不如他们的非自闭症同龄人,而随着年龄的增长,组间差异会逐渐缩小。这种与年龄相关的模式表明,在自闭症中,风险评估和决策的青春期有积极的发展,但也暗示了不同的发展轨迹。这些发现还表明风险类型的表现存在差异,智力和流体认知等因素也有额外的复杂影响,这需要进一步的研究。