German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;68(3):325-334. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.041. Epub 2024 May 1.
Fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) is a valuable treatment in patients with chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (PD-TAAA). This study aimed to analyse early and follow up outcomes of F/B-EVAR in these patients.
Thirty day and follow up outcomes of consecutive patients with PD-TAAA treated with F/B-EVAR in a tertiary centre over eight years were analysed retrospectively. All patients presenting with PD-TAAA and managed with F/B-EVAR were eligible. A modified Crawford's classification system was used. Thirty day mortality and major adverse event (MAE) rates were analysed. Time to event data were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Fifty five patients (80% men, mean age 63.7 ± 7.7 years) were included: 12 (22%) were managed urgently; 25 (46%) for chronic type B aortic dissection; and the remainder for residual type A aortic dissection. Of these patients, 88% had undergone previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was used in 91%. Fifteen (27%) patients were treated with F-EVAR, nine (16%) with fenestrations and branches, and 31 (56%) with B-EVAR. False lumen adjunctive procedures were used in 56%. Technical success was achieved in 96% of patients. The thirty day mortality rate was 7% and MAE rate was 20%. Spinal cord injury (SCI) grades 1 - 3 and grade 3 rates were 13% and 2%, respectively. Mean follow up was 33.0 ± 18.4 months. Survival and freedom from unscheduled re-intervention were 86% (standard error [SE] 5%) and 55% (SE 8%) at 24 months, respectively. Freedom from target vessel stenosis and occlusion was higher in F-EVAR at the 12 month follow up (p = .006) compared with B-EVAR.
Fenestrated or branched endovascular repairs in patients with PD-TAAA showed high technical success, with acceptable early mortality and MAE rates. The SCI rate was > 10%, despite CSFD use and staged procedures. Almost a half of patients needed an unscheduled re-intervention within 24 months after F/B-EVAR.
开窗或分支型腔内主动脉修复术(F/B-EVAR)是治疗慢性夹层胸主动脉瘤(PD-TAAA)患者的一种有效治疗方法。本研究旨在分析 F/B-EVAR 在这些患者中的早期和随访结果。
回顾性分析了 8 年来在一家三级中心连续接受 F/B-EVAR 治疗的 PD-TAAA 患者的 30 天和随访结果。所有患有 PD-TAAA 并接受 F/B-EVAR 治疗的患者均符合条件。使用改良的 Crawford 分类系统。分析了 30 天死亡率和主要不良事件(MAE)发生率。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析估计时间相关数据。
55 例患者(80%为男性,平均年龄 63.7 ± 7.7 岁)入选:12 例(22%)为紧急治疗;25 例(46%)为慢性 B 型主动脉夹层;其余为残留型 A 型主动脉夹层。这些患者中,88%曾接受过胸主动脉腔内修复术。91%使用预防性腰大池引流(CSFD)。15 例(27%)患者行 F-EVAR 治疗,9 例(16%)行开窗和分支治疗,31 例(56%)行 B-EVAR 治疗。56%的患者行假腔辅助治疗。96%的患者达到技术成功。30 天死亡率为 7%,MAE 发生率为 20%。脊髓损伤(SCI)1-3 级和 3 级发生率分别为 13%和 2%。平均随访时间为 33.0 ± 18.4 个月。24 个月时的生存率和无计划性再干预率分别为 86%(标准误差[SE]5%)和 55%(SE 8%)。12 个月随访时,F-EVAR 的靶血管狭窄和闭塞发生率低于 B-EVAR(p =.006)。
PD-TAAA 患者行开窗或分支型腔内修复术,技术成功率高,早期死亡率和 MAE 发生率可接受。尽管使用了 CSFD 和分期手术,SCI 发生率仍超过 10%。近一半的患者在 F/B-EVAR 后 24 个月内需要进行非计划性再干预。