Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体成形术中靠近治疗椎体的部位,随访时新椎体压缩性骨折的发生率越高。

The Closer Vicinity to Treated Vertebrae in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty, the Higher Rate of New Vertebral Compression Fractures at Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e749-e758. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.162. Epub 2024 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether risk of new vertebral compression fractures (NVCFs) was associated with vicinity to treated vertebrae in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHODS

All OVCF (T6-L5) patients treated with PVP between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Vicinity to treated vertebrae was defined as the number of vertebrae between an untreated and its closest treated level. The closest treated level was chosen as reference vertebra. Clinical, radiologic, and surgical parameters were compared between groups of reference vertebrae for each vicinity NVCF.

RESULTS

In total, 1348 patients with 1592 fractured and 14,584 normal vertebrae were enrolled. NVCF was identified in 20.1% (271 of 1348) patients in 2.2% (319 of 14584) vertebrae in a mean follow-up time of 24.3 ± 11.9 months. Rate of NVCF in vicinity 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 level were 4.6% (130 of 2808), 2.4% (62 of 2558), 1.8% (42 of 2365), 1.5% (31 of 2131), 1.3% (23 of 1739), 1.3% (17 of 1298), 0.8% (7 of 847), 0.9% (4 of 450), 0.8% (2 of 245), 0.9% (1 of 117), and 0% (0 of 26), respectively. Rate of NVCF in vicinity 1 level was significantly higher than that in vicinity 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 level, respectively. However, compared to reference vertebrae for vicinity 1 NVCF, any clinical, radiologic, or surgical parameters were not significantly different in those for vicinity 2, 3, and 4 NVCF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The closer vicinity to treated vertebrae in PVP, the higher rate of NVCF at follow-up. However, any clinical, radiologic, or surgical parameters might not matter in this phenomenon of vicinity-related NVCF.

摘要

目的

探讨经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)时,新椎体压缩性骨折(NVCF)的风险是否与邻近治疗椎体有关。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 PVP 治疗的所有 OVCF(T6-L5)患者。邻近治疗椎体的定义为未治疗椎体与其最近的治疗水平之间的椎体数。最近的治疗水平被选为参考椎体。比较各组参考椎体的邻近 NVCF 的临床、放射学和手术参数。

结果

共纳入 1348 例患者,1592 个骨折椎体和 14584 个正常椎体。在平均随访 24.3±11.9 个月后,20.1%(1348 例中的 271 例)患者和 2.2%(14584 个椎体中的 319 个)发生了 NVCF。邻近 1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8、9、10 和 11 个水平的 NVCF 发生率分别为 4.6%(2808 个中的 130 个)、2.4%(2558 个中的 62 个)、1.8%(2365 个中的 42 个)、1.5%(2131 个中的 31 个)、1.3%(1739 个中的 23 个)、1.3%(1298 个中的 17 个)、0.8%(847 个中的 7 个)、0.9%(450 个中的 4 个)、0.8%(245 个中的 2 个)、0.9%(117 个中的 1 个)和 0%(26 个中的 0 个)。邻近 1 水平的 NVCF 发生率明显高于邻近 2、3、4、5、6、7、8 和 9 水平。然而,与邻近 1 水平 NVCF 的参考椎体相比,邻近 2、3 和 4 水平 NVCF 的任何临床、放射学或手术参数均无显著差异。

结论

PVP 中与治疗椎体越接近,随访时发生 NVCF 的几率越高。然而,在这种邻近相关的 NVCF 现象中,任何临床、放射学或手术参数可能都不重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验