Suppr超能文献

使用松树皮、橡木灰和贻贝壳去除阿奇霉素。

Azithromycin removal using pine bark, oak ash and mussel shell.

机构信息

Dept. Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Engineering Polytechnic School, Univ. Santiago de Compostela, 27002, Lugo, Spain.

Dept. Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Engineering Polytechnic School, Univ. Santiago de Compostela, 27002, Lugo, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 3):119048. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119048. Epub 2024 May 1.

Abstract

Adsorption is considered an interesting option for removing antibiotics from the environment because of its simple design, low cost, and potential efficiency. In this work we evaluated three by-products (pine bark, oak ash, and mussel shell) as bio-adsorbents for the antibiotic azithromycin (AZM). Furthermore, they were added at doses of 48 t ha to four different soils, then comparing AZM removal for soils with and without bio-adsorbents. Batch-type experiments were used, adding AZM concentrations between 2.5 and 600 μmol L to the different bio-adsorbents and soil + bio-adsorbent mixtures. Regarding the bio-adsorbents, oak ash showed the best adsorption scores (9600 μmol kg, meaning >80% retention), followed by pine bark (8280 μmol kg, 69%) and mussel shell (between 3000 and 6000 μmol kg, 25-50% retention). Adsorption data were adjusted to different models (Linear, Freundlich and Langmuir), showing that just mussel shell presented an acceptable fitting to the Freundlich equation, while pine bark and oak ash did not present a good adjustment to any of the three models. Regarding desorption, the values were always below the detection limit, indicating a rather irreversible adsorption of AZM onto these three by-products. Furthermore, the results showed that when the lowest concentrations of AZM were added to the not amended soils they adsorbed 100% of the antibiotic, whereas when the highest concentrations of AZM were spread, the adsorption decreased to 55%. However, when any of the three bio-adsorbents was added to the soils, AZM adsorption reached 100% for all the antibiotic concentrations used. Desorption was null in all cases for both soils with and without bio-adsorbents. These results, corresponding to an investigation carried out for the first time for the antibiotic AZM, can be seen as relevant in the search of low-cost alternative treatments to face environmental pollution caused by this emerging contaminant.

摘要

吸附被认为是一种从环境中去除抗生素的有趣选择,因为它的设计简单、成本低且具有潜在的效率。在这项工作中,我们评估了三种副产品(松皮、橡木灰和贻贝壳)作为抗生素阿奇霉素(AZM)的生物吸附剂。此外,它们以 48 t ha 的剂量添加到四种不同的土壤中,然后比较添加和不添加生物吸附剂的土壤中 AZM 的去除情况。使用批量实验,在不同的生物吸附剂和土壤+生物吸附剂混合物中添加 2.5 至 600 μmol L 的 AZM 浓度。就生物吸附剂而言,橡木灰显示出最好的吸附评分(9600 μmol kg,意味着 >80%的保留率),其次是松皮(8280 μmol kg,69%)和贻贝壳(3000 至 6000 μmol kg,25-50%的保留率)。吸附数据被调整到不同的模型(线性、弗伦德利希和朗缪尔),表明只有贻贝壳对弗伦德利希方程有较好的拟合,而松皮和橡木灰对三个模型都没有很好的拟合。关于解吸,值始终低于检测限,表明 AZM 相当不可逆地吸附到这三种副产物上。此外,结果表明,当向未添加土壤中添加最低浓度的 AZM 时,它们吸附了 100%的抗生素,而当添加最高浓度的 AZM 时,吸附率下降到 55%。然而,当向土壤中添加三种生物吸附剂中的任何一种时,所有使用的抗生素浓度的 AZM 吸附都达到 100%。在所有情况下,无论是否添加生物吸附剂,解吸均为零。这些结果对应于首次针对抗生素 AZM 进行的调查,可以被视为在寻找低成本替代处理方法以应对这种新兴污染物造成的环境污染方面的相关结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验