• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同生物吸附材料改良的农业土壤中阿莫西林的保留/释放

Amoxicillin Retention/Release in Agricultural Soils Amended with Different Bio-Adsorbent Materials.

作者信息

Cela-Dablanca Raquel, Barreiro Ana, Rodríguez-López Lucia, Santás-Miguel Vanesa, Arias-Estévez Manuel, Fernández-Sanjurjo María J, Álvarez-Rodríguez Esperanza, Núñez-Delgado Avelino

机构信息

Department Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Engineering Polytechnic School, University Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.

Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty Sciences, University Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;15(9):3200. doi: 10.3390/ma15093200.

DOI:10.3390/ma15093200
PMID:35591534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9100866/
Abstract

The antibiotic amoxicillin (AMX) may reach soils and other environmental compartments as a pollutant, with potential to affect human and environmental health. To solve/minimize these hazards, it would be clearly interesting to develop effective and low-cost methods allowing the retention/removal of this compound. With these aspects in mind, this work focuses on studying the adsorption/desorption of AMX in different agricultural soils, with and without the amendment of three bio-adsorbents, specifically, pine bark, wood ash and mussel shell. For performing the research, batch-type experiments were carried out, adding increasing concentrations of the antibiotic to soil samples with and without the amendment of these three bio-adsorbents. The results showed that the amendments increased AMX adsorption, with pine bark being the most effective. Among the adsorption models that were tested, the Freundlich equation was the one showing the best fit to the empirical adsorption results. Regarding the desorption values, there was a decrease affecting the soils to which the bio-adsorbents were added, with overall desorption not exceeding 6% in any case. In general, the results indicate that the bio-adsorbents under study contributed to retaining AMX in the soils in which they were applied, and therefore reduced the risk of contamination by this antibiotic, which can be considered useful and relevant to protect environmental quality and public health.

摘要

抗生素阿莫西林(AMX)可能作为一种污染物进入土壤和其他环境介质,有可能影响人类健康和环境。为了解决/最小化这些危害,开发有效且低成本的方法来保留/去除这种化合物显然会很有意义。考虑到这些方面,本研究聚焦于探究AMX在不同农业土壤中的吸附/解吸情况,这些土壤添加或未添加三种生物吸附剂,即松树皮、木灰和贻贝壳。为开展该研究,进行了批次型实验,向添加和未添加这三种生物吸附剂的土壤样品中加入浓度不断增加的抗生素。结果表明,添加物增加了AMX的吸附,其中松树皮最为有效。在所测试的吸附模型中,弗伦德利希方程最能拟合实验吸附结果。关于解吸值,添加了生物吸附剂的土壤的解吸有所降低,无论何种情况总体解吸均不超过6%。总体而言,结果表明所研究的生物吸附剂有助于将AMX保留在所施用的土壤中,因此降低了这种抗生素的污染风险,这对于保护环境质量和公众健康而言是有用且重要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ee/9100866/6b9f466c187d/materials-15-03200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ee/9100866/f52ee3aa5312/materials-15-03200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ee/9100866/6b9f466c187d/materials-15-03200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ee/9100866/f52ee3aa5312/materials-15-03200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ee/9100866/6b9f466c187d/materials-15-03200-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Amoxicillin Retention/Release in Agricultural Soils Amended with Different Bio-Adsorbent Materials.不同生物吸附材料改良的农业土壤中阿莫西林的保留/释放
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;15(9):3200. doi: 10.3390/ma15093200.
2
Potential of low-cost bio-adsorbents to retain amoxicillin in contaminated water.低成本生物吸附剂在受污染水中保留阿莫西林的潜力。
Environ Res. 2022 Oct;213:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113621. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
Azithromycin removal using pine bark, oak ash and mussel shell.使用松树皮、橡木灰和贻贝壳去除阿奇霉素。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 3):119048. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119048. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Influence of mussel shell, oak ash and pine bark on the adsorption and desorption of sulfonamides in agricultural soils.贻贝壳、橡木灰和松皮对农业土壤中磺胺类药物吸附和解吸的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Adsorption of antibiotics on bio-adsorbents derived from the forestry and agro-food industries.农林副产物基生物吸附剂对抗生素的吸附
Environ Res. 2023 Sep 15;233:116360. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116360. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Cu and As(V) Adsorption and Desorption on/from Different Soils and Bio-Adsorbents.铜和五价砷在不同土壤及生物吸附剂上的吸附与解吸
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 19;15(14):5023. doi: 10.3390/ma15145023.
7
Sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine and sulfachloropyridazine removal using three different porous materials: Pine bark, "oak ash" and mussel shell.采用三种不同的多孔材料(松树皮、“橡木灰”和贻贝壳)去除磺胺嘧啶、磺胺甲嘧啶和磺胺氯哒嗪。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110814. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110814. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
8
Competitive adsorption/desorption of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline on pine bark, oak ash and mussel shell.竞争吸附/解吸四环素、土霉素和金霉素在松皮、橡木灰和贻贝壳上的行为。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Nov 15;250:109509. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109509. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
9
Relevance of sorption in bio-reduction of amoxicillin taking place in forest and crop soils.吸附作用在森林和作物土壤中阿莫西林生物还原过程中的相关性。
Environ Res. 2022 May 15;208:112753. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112753. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
10
As(V)/Cr(VI) retention on un-amended and waste-amended soil samples: competitive experiments.未添加和添加废物的土壤样品对砷(V)/六价铬(VI)的保留:竞争实验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jan;24(1):1051-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8015-0. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of the Highly Toxic Anticoccidial Monensin Using Six Different Low-Cost Bio-Adsorbents.使用六种不同低成本生物吸附剂去除高毒性抗球虫药莫能菌素
Toxics. 2024 Aug 19;12(8):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics12080606.

本文引用的文献

1
Transport and fate of antibiotics in a typical aqua-agricultural catchment explained by rainfall events: Implications for catchment management.降雨事件解释了抗生素在典型的水产养殖集水区中的迁移和归宿:对集水区管理的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112953. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112953. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
2
Sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine and sulfachloropyridazine removal using three different porous materials: Pine bark, "oak ash" and mussel shell.采用三种不同的多孔材料(松树皮、“橡木灰”和贻贝壳)去除磺胺嘧啶、磺胺甲嘧啶和磺胺氯哒嗪。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110814. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110814. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
The diagnostic value of metagenomic next⁃generation sequencing in infectious diseases.
宏基因组下一代测序在感染性疾病中的诊断价值。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05746-5.
4
Alternative, environmentally conscious approaches for removing antibiotics from wastewater treatment systems.替代方案:从废水处理系统中去除抗生素的环保方法。
Chemosphere. 2021 Jan;263:128177. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128177. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Antibiotics in soil and water in China-a systematic review and source analysis.中国土壤和水中的抗生素—系统评价与源分析。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Nov;266(Pt 1):115147. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115147. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Ti-pillared montmorillonite clay for adsorptive removal of amoxicillin, imipramine, diclofenac-sodium, and paracetamol from water.用于从水中吸附去除阿莫西林、丙咪嗪、双氯芬酸钠和扑热息痛的钛柱撑蒙脱石粘土。
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Nov 15;399:122832. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122832. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Occurrence and toxicity of antibiotics in the aquatic environment: A review.抗生素在水环境中的产生和毒性:综述。
Chemosphere. 2020 Jul;251:126351. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126351. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Removal of caffeine, nicotine and amoxicillin from (waste)waters by various adsorbents. A review.各种吸附剂去除废水中的咖啡因、尼古丁和阿莫西林。综述。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110236. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110236. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
9
Influence of mussel shell, oak ash and pine bark on the adsorption and desorption of sulfonamides in agricultural soils.贻贝壳、橡木灰和松皮对农业土壤中磺胺类药物吸附和解吸的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110221. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
10
Best available technologies and treatment trains to address current challenges in urban wastewater reuse for irrigation of crops in EU countries.针对欧盟国家城市废水回用于灌溉作物的当前挑战,提供最佳可用技术和处理方案。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 25;710:136312. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136312. Epub 2019 Dec 30.