Patil Deepali S, Tikhile Priya, Gangwani Nikita
Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57361. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57361. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a common condition affecting a significant portion of the population and is effectively managed through various interventions, including nonpharmacological approaches. Physical therapy plays a crucial role in CGH management, with numerous studies supporting its effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of specific nonpharmacological physical therapy interventions for CGH. A comprehensive search was conducted across various databases (PubMed, Medline, PEDro, and Cochrane Library) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2017 and January 2023 investigating the effectiveness of specific nonpharmacological physical therapy interventions for CGH. We employed manual searches to capture potentially missed studies. Independent reviewers screened all studies based on predefined eligibility criteria. Extracted data included methodology, specific interventions, outcome measures (headache score, strength, pain, and quality of life (QOL)), and study conclusions. Eight RCTs were identified as meeting all inclusion criteria and were thus included in the data synthesis. The findings from these trials revealed a diverse range of nonpharmacological physical therapy interventions, including but not limited to manual therapy, exercise therapy, and multimodal approaches. Specifically, the interventions demonstrated significant improvements in headache scores, strength, pain levels, and overall QOL among individuals with CGH. These results underscore the multifaceted benefits of physical therapy in managing CGH and highlight its potential as a comprehensive treatment option. This review identified eight relevant RCTs investigating nonpharmacological interventions for CGH. Despite the promising findings, this review acknowledges several limitations, including the limited sample size and the heterogeneity of interventions across studies. These limitations emphasize the necessity for further research to elucidate optimal intervention strategies and refine treatment protocols. Nevertheless, the comprehensive analysis presented herein reinforces the pivotal role of physical therapy in not only alleviating pain but also enhancing function and improving the QOL for individuals suffering from CGH.
颈源性头痛(CGH)是一种常见病症,影响着相当一部分人群,可通过包括非药物方法在内的各种干预措施得到有效管理。物理治疗在CGH管理中起着关键作用,众多研究支持其有效性。本系统评价旨在评估特定非药物物理治疗干预对CGH的有效性。在多个数据库(PubMed、Medline、PEDro和Cochrane图书馆)中进行了全面检索,以查找2017年1月至2023年1月期间发表的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验调查了特定非药物物理治疗干预对CGH的有效性。我们采用手动检索以获取可能遗漏的研究。独立评审员根据预先确定的纳入标准筛选所有研究。提取的数据包括方法、特定干预措施、结局指标(头痛评分、力量、疼痛和生活质量(QOL))以及研究结论。八项RCT被确定符合所有纳入标准,因此被纳入数据合成。这些试验的结果显示了各种各样的非药物物理治疗干预措施,包括但不限于手法治疗、运动疗法和多模式方法。具体而言,这些干预措施在CGH患者的头痛评分、力量、疼痛水平和总体QOL方面显示出显著改善。这些结果强调了物理治疗在管理CGH方面的多方面益处,并突出了其作为综合治疗选择的潜力。本综述确定了八项调查CGH非药物干预措施的相关RCT。尽管有这些有前景的发现,但本综述承认存在一些局限性,包括样本量有限以及各研究间干预措施的异质性。这些局限性强调了进一步研究以阐明最佳干预策略和完善治疗方案的必要性。然而,本文所呈现的综合分析强化了物理治疗不仅在减轻疼痛方面,而且在增强功能和改善CGH患者生活质量方面的关键作用。