Suppr超能文献

非侵入性干预措施对治疗与颈部疼痛相关的头痛是否有效?安大略省交通伤害管理协议(OPTIMa)合作组织对骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组的更新。

Are non-invasive interventions effective for the management of headaches associated with neck pain? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

作者信息

Varatharajan Sharanya, Ferguson Brad, Chrobak Karen, Shergill Yaadwinder, Côté Pierre, Wong Jessica J, Yu Hainan, Shearer Heather M, Southerst Danielle, Sutton Deborah, Randhawa Kristi, Jacobs Craig, Abdulla Sean, Woitzik Erin, Marchand Andrée-Anne, van der Velde Gabrielle, Carroll Linda J, Nordin Margareta, Ammendolia Carlo, Mior Silvano, Ameis Arthur, Stupar Maja, Taylor-Vaisey Anne

机构信息

UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT) and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.

Division of Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):1971-99. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4376-9. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To update findings of the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders and evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of patients with headaches associated with neck pain (i.e., tension-type, cervicogenic, or whiplash-related headaches).

METHODS

We searched five databases from 1990 to 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing non-invasive interventions with other interventions, placebo/sham, or no interventions. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to determine scientific admissibility. Studies with a low risk of bias were synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles.

RESULTS

We screened 17,236 citations, 15 studies were relevant, and 10 had a low risk of bias. The evidence suggests that episodic tension-type headaches should be managed with low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises. Patients with chronic tension-type headaches may also benefit from low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises; relaxation training with stress coping therapy; or multimodal care that includes spinal mobilization, craniocervical exercises, and postural correction. For cervicogenic headaches, low load endurance craniocervical and cervicoscapular exercises; or manual therapy (manipulation with or without mobilization) to the cervical and thoracic spine may also be helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of headaches associated with neck pain should include exercise. Patients who suffer from chronic tension-type headaches may also benefit from relaxation training with stress coping therapy or multimodal care. Patients with cervicogenic headache may also benefit from a course of manual therapy.

摘要

目的

更新2000 - 2010年骨与关节十年颈痛及其相关疾病特别工作组的研究结果,并评估非侵入性和非药物干预措施对治疗与颈痛相关的头痛(即紧张型、颈源性或挥鞭样损伤相关头痛)患者的有效性。

方法

我们检索了1990年至2015年的五个数据库,查找比较非侵入性干预措施与其他干预措施、安慰剂/假治疗或无干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究和病例对照研究。由独立评审员随机配对,按照苏格兰校际指南网络标准严格评估符合条件的研究,以确定其科学可接受性。根据最佳证据合成原则,对偏倚风险较低的研究进行合成。

结果

我们筛选了17236条文献,15项研究相关,10项偏倚风险较低。证据表明,发作性紧张型头痛应采用低负荷耐力的颅颈和颈肩胛运动进行治疗。慢性紧张型头痛患者也可能从低负荷耐力的颅颈和颈肩胛运动、应激应对疗法的放松训练或包括脊柱松动术、颅颈运动和姿势矫正的多模式护理中获益。对于颈源性头痛,低负荷耐力的颅颈和颈肩胛运动,或对颈椎和胸椎的手法治疗(有或无松动术的整复)也可能有帮助。

结论

与颈痛相关的头痛的治疗应包括运动。患有慢性紧张型头痛的患者也可能从应激应对疗法的放松训练或多模式护理中获益。颈源性头痛患者也可能从一个疗程的手法治疗中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验