Nadeem Omar, Aranha Michelle P, Redd Robert, Timonian Michael, Magidson Sophie, Lightbody Elizabeth D, Alberge Jean-Baptiste, Bertamini Luca, Dutta Ankit K, El-Khoury Habib, Bustoros Mark, Laubach Jacob P, Bianchi Giada, O'Donnell Elizabeth, Wu Ting, Tsuji Junko, Anderson Kenneth, Getz Gad, Trippa Lorenzo, Richardson Paul G, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis Romanos, Ghobrial Irene M
Center for Early Detection and Interception of Blood Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Broad Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 19:2024.04.19.24306082. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.19.24306082.
Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit in previous studies of lenalidomide with or without dexamethasone. Triplets and quadruplet studies have been examined in this same population. However, to date, none of these studies examined the impact of depth of response on long-term outcomes of participants treated with lenalidomide-based therapy, and whether the use of the 20/2/20 model or the addition of genomic alterations can further define the population that would benefit the most from early therapeutic intervention. Here, we present the results of the phase II study of the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with HR-SMM with long-term follow-up and baseline single-cell tumor and immune sequencing that help refine the population to be treated for early intervention studies.
This is a phase II trial of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRD) in HR-SMM. Patients received 9 cycles of induction therapy with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by maintenance with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; and lenalidomide 15mg d1-21 for 15 cycles for 24 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after 2 years of therapy. Secondary endpoints included depth of response, biochemical progression, and correlative studies included single-cell RNA sequencing and/or whole-genome sequencing of the tumor and single-cell sequencing of immune cells at baseline.
Fifty-five patients, with a median age of 64, were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate was 93%, with 31% of patients achieving a complete response and 45% achieving a very good partial response or better. The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (16 patients; 29%), leukopenia (10 patients; 18%), lymphocytopenia (8 patients; 15%), and thrombocytopenia (4 patients; 7%). Non-hematologic grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia (7 patients; 13%), rash (5 patients; 9%), and hypokalemia (4 patients; 7%). After a median follow-up of 50 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.6 months (95% CI: 39.9 - not reached; NR) and median overall survival has not been reached. Patients achieving VGPR or better had a significantly better progression-free survival (p<0.001) compared to those who did not achieve VGPR (median PFS 58.2 months vs. 31.3 months). Biochemical progression preceded or was concurrent with the development of SLiM-CRAB criteria in eight patients during follow-up, indicating that biochemical progression is a meaningful endpoint that correlates with the development of end-organ damage. High-risk 20/2/20 participants had the worst PFS compared to low- and intermediate-risk participants. The use of whole genome or single-cell sequencing of tumor cells identified high-risk aberrations that were not identified by FISH alone and aided in the identification of participants at risk of progression. scRNA-seq analysis revealed a positive correlation between MHC class I expression and response to proteasome inhibition and at the same time a decreased proportion of GZMB+ T cells within the clonally expanded CD8+ T cell population correlated with suboptimal response.
Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM demonstrates significant clinical activity with an overall favorable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or greater led to significant improvement in time to progression, suggesting that achieving deep response is beneficial in HR-SMM. Biochemical progression correlates with end-organ damage. Patients with high-risk FISH and lack of deep response had poor outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT02916771).
在既往来那度胺联合或不联合地塞米松治疗高危冒烟型骨髓瘤(HR - SMM)的研究中,早期治疗干预已显示出获益。在同一人群中也对三联和四联方案进行了研究。然而,迄今为止,这些研究均未探讨缓解深度对接受来那度胺为基础治疗的参与者长期结局的影响,以及使用20/2/20模型或添加基因组改变是否能进一步明确最能从早期治疗干预中获益的人群。在此,我们展示了在HR - SMM患者中进行的伊沙佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松联合治疗的II期研究结果,并进行了长期随访以及基线单细胞肿瘤和免疫测序,这有助于优化早期干预研究的治疗人群。
这是一项在HR - SMM患者中进行的伊沙佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(IRD)的II期试验。患者接受9个周期的诱导治疗,伊沙佐米4mg于第1、8和15天给药;来那度胺25mg于第1 - 21天给药;地塞米松40mg于第1、8、15和22天给药。诱导期之后进行维持治疗,伊沙佐米4mg于第1、8和15天给药;来那度胺15mg第1 - 21天给药,共15个周期,持续治疗24个月。主要终点是治疗2年后的无进展生存期。次要终点包括缓解深度、生化进展,相关研究包括基线时肿瘤的单细胞RNA测序和/或全基因组测序以及免疫细胞的单细胞测序。
55例患者入组本研究,中位年龄64岁。总缓解率为93%,其中31%的患者达到完全缓解,45%的患者达到非常好的部分缓解或更好。最常见的3级或更高级别的治疗相关血液学毒性为中性粒细胞减少(16例患者;29%)、白细胞减少(10例患者;18%)、淋巴细胞减少(8例患者;15%)和血小板减少(4例患者;7%)。非血液学3级或更高级别的毒性包括低磷血症(7例患者;13%)、皮疹(5例患者;9%)和低钾血症(4例患者;7%)。中位随访50个月后,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为48.6个月(95%CI:39.9 - 未达到;NR),中位总生存期尚未达到。达到VGPR或更好的患者与未达到VGPR的患者相比,无进展生存期显著更好(p<0.001)(中位PFS 58.2个月对31.3个月)。在随访期间,8例患者的生化进展先于或与SLiM - CRAB标准的出现同时发生,表明生化进展是一个与终末器官损害发展相关的有意义的终点。与低风险和中风险参与者相比,高风险20/2/20参与者的PFS最差。对肿瘤细胞进行全基因组或单细胞测序发现了单独FISH未识别的高风险畸变,并有助于识别有进展风险的参与者。scRNA - seq分析显示MHC I类表达与蛋白酶体抑制反应之间呈正相关,同时在克隆扩增的CD8 + T细胞群体中GZMB + T细胞比例降低与反应欠佳相关。
伊沙佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗HR - SMM显示出显著的临床活性,总体安全性良好。达到VGPR或更高缓解导致进展时间显著改善,表明在HR - SMM中实现深度缓解是有益的。生化进展与终末器官损害相关。具有高风险FISH且缺乏深度缓解的患者预后较差。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:(NCT02916771)。