Lohman Trevor, Sible Isabel J, Shenasa Fatemah, Engstrom Allison C, Kapoor Arunima, Alitin John Paul M, Gaubert Aimee, Thayer Julian F, Ferrer Farrah, Nation Daniel A
University of Southern California, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.
University of Southern California.
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 19:rs.3.rs-4190135. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4190135/v1.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is emerging as an important risk factor across numerous disease states, including cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative disease in older adults. However, there is no current consensus regarding specific use cases for the numerous available BPV metrics. There is also little published data supporting the ability to reliably measure BPV across metrics in older adults. BPV metrics were derived from continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring data. Two sequential 7-minute waveforms were analyzed. Absolute and relative reliability testing was performed. Differences between antihypertensive medication users and non-users on BPV metric reliability was also assessed. All sequence and dispersion based BPV metrics displayed good test-retest reliability. A measure of BP instability displayed only moderate reliability. Systolic and diastolic average real variability displayed the highest levels of reliability at ICC= .87 and .82 respectively. Additionally, systolic average real variability was the most reliable metric in both the antihypertensive use group, and the no antihypertensive use group. Beat-to-beat dispersion and sequence-based metrics of BPV can be reliably obtained from older adults using noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring. Average real variability may be the most reliable and specific beat-to-beat blood pressure variability metric due to its decreased susceptibility to outliers and low frequency blood pressure oscillations.
血压变异性(BPV)正在成为众多疾病状态下的一个重要风险因素,包括老年人的脑血管疾病和神经退行性疾病。然而,对于众多可用的BPV指标的具体应用案例,目前尚无共识。也几乎没有已发表的数据支持在老年人中跨指标可靠测量BPV的能力。BPV指标源自连续逐搏血压监测数据。分析了两个连续的7分钟波形。进行了绝对和相对可靠性测试。还评估了抗高血压药物使用者和非使用者在BPV指标可靠性方面的差异。所有基于序列和离散度的BPV指标均显示出良好的重测可靠性。一种血压不稳定性测量方法仅显示出中等可靠性。收缩压和舒张压平均实际变异性分别在ICC = 0.87和0.82时显示出最高水平的可靠性。此外,收缩压平均实际变异性在抗高血压药物使用组和非抗高血压药物使用组中都是最可靠的指标。使用无创连续血压监测可以从老年人中可靠地获得基于逐搏离散度和序列的BPV指标。平均实际变异性可能是最可靠且最具特异性的逐搏血压变异性指标,因为它对异常值和低频血压波动的敏感性较低。