Tang Ke, Bu Bo, Tian Hongcheng, Li Yang, Jiang Xingwang, Qian Zenghui, Zhou Yiqiang
Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Information, Medical Supplies Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Surg. 2024 Apr 18;11:1375861. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1375861. eCollection 2024.
To assess the impact of automated algorithms on the trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence for individualized surgical planning.
At Chinese PLA General Hospital, trainees were enrolled to undergo decision-making capacity and confidence training through three alternative visual tasks of the inferior clivus model formed from an automated algorithm and given consecutively in three exemplars. The rationale of automated decision-making was used to instruct each trainee.
Following automated decision-making calculation in 50 skull base models, we screened out three optimal plans, infra-tubercle approach (ITA), trans-tubercle approach (TTA), and supra-tubercle approach (STA) for 41 (82.00%), 8 (16.00%), and 1 (2.00%) subject, respectively. From September 1, 2023, through November 17, 2023, 62 trainees (median age [range]: 27 [26-28]; 28 [45.16%] female; 25 [40.32%] neurosurgeons) made a decision among the three plans for the three typical models (ITA, TTA, and STA exemplars). The confidence ratings had fine test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho: 0.979; 95% CI: 0.970 to 0.988) and criterion validity with time spent (Spearman's rho: -0.954; 95%CI: -0.963 to -0.945). Following instruction of automated decision-making, time spent (initial test: 24.02 vs. 7.13 in ITA; 30.24 vs. 7.06 in TTA; 34.21 vs. 12.82 in STA) and total hits (initial test: 30 vs. 16 in ITA; 37 vs. 17 in TTA; 42 vs. 28 in STA) reduced significantly; confidence ratings (initial test: 2 vs. 4 in ITA; 2 vs. 4 in TTA; 1 vs. 3 in STA) increased correspondingly. Statistically significant differences ( < 0.05) were observed for the above comparisons.
The education tool generated by automated decision-making considers surgical freedom and injury risk for the individualized risk-benefit assessment, which may provide explicit information to increase trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence.
评估自动化算法对学员个体化手术规划决策能力和信心的影响。
在中国人民解放军总医院,学员通过由自动化算法形成的三个替代视觉任务,对斜坡下部模型进行决策能力和信心训练,并连续给出三个示例。使用自动化决策的原理指导每位学员。
在对50个颅底模型进行自动化决策计算后,我们分别为41名(82.00%)、8名(16.00%)和1名(2.00%)受试者筛选出三种最佳手术方案,即结节下入路(ITA)、经结节入路(TTA)和结节上入路(STA)。从2023年9月1日至2023年11月17日,62名学员(中位年龄[范围]:27岁[26 - 28岁];28名[45.16%]为女性;25名[40.32%]为神经外科医生)针对三种典型模型(ITA、TTA和STA示例)在三种手术方案中做出决策。信心评分具有良好的重测信度(斯皮尔曼相关系数:0.979;95%置信区间:0.970至0.988)以及与所花费时间的效标效度(斯皮尔曼相关系数:-0.954;95%置信区间:-0.963至-0.945)。在接受自动化决策指导后,所花费时间(初始测试:ITA为24.02对7.13;TTA为30.24对7.06;STA为34.21对12.82)和总命中数(初始测试:ITA为30对16;TTA为37对17;STA为42对28)显著减少;信心评分(初始测试:ITA为2对4;TTA为2对4;STA为1对3)相应增加。上述比较均观察到具有统计学意义的差异(<0.05)。
自动化决策生成的教育工具在个体化风险效益评估中考虑了手术自由度和损伤风险,可为学员提供明确信息,以提高其决策能力和信心。